3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. ‘Gun Violence’ and Children
August 26, 2026 at 1:18 PM

‘Gun Violence’ and Children

Ekosj
@Ekosj

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark19likesJoin to like30comments

I routinely hear the Leftist talking point that "gun violence" is the leading cause of death among children. Leaving aside the "gun violence" phrasing ... the stat itself is misleading in the extreme. "Children" technically means anyone under the age of 18. So "children" covers a lot of ground. But when you think of "children" are you thinking of a 17 year-old? Probably not. But THAT'S the age group where the "gun violence" deaths are clustered. Let's look at the mortality stats for what most of us would consider "children" ... ages 1-14. The following was created from data gathered from childstats.gov...

Table PHY7.B Child injury and mortality: Death rates among children ages 1–14 (Deaths per 100,000 children)

The two leading causes of death for kids 1-14 are Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents and Drowning. (I dug around but couldn't find out how many of the Suicide deaths [1.2 per 100,000] were embedded in the Firearms deaths number of 2.4 per 100,000.)

So, if Leftists genuinely wanted to have the greatest impact on reducing childhood deaths they'd focus on pools and car seats rather than guns. But no. As usual it's never about what it's allegedly about.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (30)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Misthiocracy has never@Misthiocracy·7w
    Ekosj (View Post):

    (I dug around but couldn’t find out how many of the Suicide deaths [1.2 per 100,000] were embedded in the Firearms deaths number of 2.4 per 100,000.)

    I'd like to know how many were gang shootings.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·7w

    We must ban all motor vehicles and water! It's for the Chirren!

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·7w

    Well done, Ekosj!! That lays out the issue beautifully. One more effort by the Left to manipulate the issue.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Gossamer Cat@GossamerCat·7w

    The data are illuminating but I don't think that splitting hairs in this case would be a winning argument. Seventeen year olds are children, they are just not innocents when it comes to gangs and firearms. But it is a tragedy nonetheless, just not one that gun control solves. I suspect fathers would help a lot.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Ekosj@Ekosj·7w
    ReplyingtoGossamer Cat

    Gossamer Cat (View Comment):

    The data are illuminating but I don’t think that splitting hairs in this case would be a winning argument. Seventeen year olds are children, they are just not innocents when it comes to gangs and firearms. But it is a tragedy nonetheless, just not one that gun control solves. I suspect fathers would help a lot.

    It's the violent guns. If only they'd make non-violent firearms...or send the violent guns to anger management.

Scroll for later comments
+25 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 30 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •