3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Conjectures About the Iran War
March 31, 2026 at 4:16 PM

Conjectures About the Iran War

Steve Fast
@SteveFast

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark24likesJoin to like100comments

Here are my conjectures on the bigger picture of the Iran War. It's all kind of speculative, so I'm happy to hear other ideas.

Trump has been determined for decades that Iran should not have nuclear weapons. He thought that the June 2025 bombing in the Twelve-Day War had done the job. He said so repeatedly.

US and Israeli intelligence showed Iran was restarting nuclear bomb work and churning out ballistic missiles in such numbers that would make it far more difficult to attack them. Trump and Netanyahu decided in late 2025 to attack Iran.

In early January 2026, protests broke out over the disastrous state of the Iranian economy. The US would have been able to give some military assistance to the protestors, but it would have upset the already planned strikes against Iran. Trump warned the Iranian regime, ineffectually, that help for the protestors was on the way. Trump thought that Iran would not dare attack the protestors then. However, this was disastrous, as it brought out more protestors, who were then slaughtered by the regime.

The US and Israel were ready to strike in late February and were looking for the best time. The strike was postponed for various reasons, then quickly launched a day early when Israel discovered the senior leadership meeting at the Ayatollah's house.

Trump and Netanyahu expected that the war would be over quickly with the decapitation strikes and heavy blows against the Iranian regime and military. However, they underestimated that the Iranian leadership consists mostly of true believers in the Islamic revolution. Trump has not found a suitable negotiation partner, although that may have changed in the last few days.

The US knew that Iran could close the Strait of Hormuz, but expected the war to be over so quickly that it would not really matter. The military has planned for the closure of the Strait, so it cannot have been a surprise. Instead, as the Iranian regime has hung, closing the Strait has become its trump card (no pun intended).

The US is rushing ground forces to the region to take the Iranian territory bordering the Strait and Kharg Island, which exports 90% of Iran's oil. The expectation is that controlling most of Iran's oil sales and the Strait of Hormuz will bring the regime to its knees, which it probably will. But what if it doesn't? What if they hang on? What will we do next? Wars have a way of proceeding to their own logic, not the way either combatant wishes.

Fissures in the Trump administration have been papered over so far by the success of the war. But Vance and his group are against the war. He has reportedly voiced his opinions internally but has remained a loyal lieutenant publicly. If the war goes sour, this could be a problem for him in 2028 as he would struggle to explain his public support for a then-unpopular war. Trump's presidency hinges on the success of the war. MAGA strongly supports the war, so it could be a problem for Vance if the war is successful and his opposition to it comes out in the 2028 primary campaign.

US weapons have performed magnificently. Once again, the US and Israel are the only militaries in the world to have taken down an integrated air defense system. Russian and Chinese weapons have performed poorly. China has to fear that its military could easily be proven to be nothing more than expensive toys in a war with the US. But China can also see that economic pressure affects the US stock market, the oil and gasoline prices, and world markets. That could be its own best weapon.

While the munitions problem is not entirely solved, it has become clear that the US only needs the expensive missiles in the early stage of a conflict. Once we have air supremacy, we can bomb at will with cheap but effective gravity bombs. We still need to remove the manufacturing roadblocks, but the problem is not as severe as once thought.

Trump is the only president who has followed through with Iran. It should have been done long ago, but kudos to Trump for finally taking the bull by the horns.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (100)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    cdor@cdor·28w

    There is a lot to agree with in this post. The naysayers will have their own opinions, some of which will be valid. This may not go as smoothly as we would like, but it is not a problem that will go away by wishing.

  • MODERATOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    E. Kent Golding@EKentGolding·28w

    Interesting conjecture. I give Trump credit for attempting to address the Iran Problem.

    On a possibly related note, the US Military Industrial Complex along with the various intelligence agencies should be doing a full court press on the issue of defending against drones at the US Military bases. The next Barksdale AFB type incident could disable much of the USAs strategic capability.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Steve Fast@SteveFast·28w
    ReplyingtoE. Kent Golding

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    Interesting conjecture. I give Trump credit for attempting to address the Iran Problem.

    On a possibly related note, the US Military Industrial Complex along with the various intelligence agencies should be doing a full court press on the issue of defending against drones at the US Military bases. The next Barksdale AFB type incident could disable much of the USAs strategic capability.

    Absolutely agree. We've made some progress in dealing with drones, but there is s loooong way yet to go, That could be our Achilles heel.

  • CONTRIBUTOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Seawriter@Seawriter·28w

    30 days isn't exactly a long war.

    Also, the US does not need the Straits of Hormuz open. China, Australia, and Europe do. When Trump played Little Red Hen and asked who would gather and mill the wheat and then bake the bread (guard the Straits), all of them said "Not I!" Which was what he was playing for before the Iranians threatened the Straits. It strengthens his position that we should withdraw from NATO and weakens the Chinese. As for the Australians they went from drilling and refining 98% of their domestic oil needs in 2000 to about 25% today. Because green. Despite that they sent their sailors aboard Charlotte to their racks when Charlotte attacked and sank the IRIS Dena. Eff 'em.

    Do you know who is not suffering an oil shortage? Japan. They had an 8-month stockpile when this all started.

    The US is in a stronger position strategically than it was 30 days ago. And not just in the Middle East.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Steve Fast@SteveFast·28w
    ReplyingtoSeawriter

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Also, the US does not need the Straits of Hormuz open. China, Australia, and Europe do.

    Since oil is a globally-traded commodity, oil from our sources can be sold to the countries who used to get theirs from the Persian Gulf. So everyone's price goes up. Whether or not we get our oil from the Persian Gulf, our prices go up. The American people are upset by the high gas prices, and that has rattled the Trump administration. Whether or not we get help, we'll have to open the Strait of Hormuz or lose the war.

    I'm disappointed that Americans are so easily upset up high gas prices when we are dealing with one of our main enemies for the last five decades. But's where we're at.

Scroll for later comments
+95 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 100 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •