Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Federalist Radio Hour
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Glenn Show
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Why did Kamala Harris pick Tim Walz? Well, we know this: It was not for the sake of “diversity.” Not to tack toward the ideological “middle” for the general election, as is the traditional practice. Not for any discernible electoral advantage. So why? My guess is that her choice was psychological as much as anything. I say that because there are pretty odd things about these two that are hard to ignore.
Some facts: We know that Kamala Harris goes through staffers at a 95% turnover rate. We know that as California’s Attorney General, she expected to be greeted by staffers with, “Good morning, General.” We have seen that she responds very defensively to even the most gentle challenges from the press. We know she has not exposed herself to any questioning from the press since Biden endorsed her for President. When she speaks publicly, we know she is careful to speak only in zero-calorie word salads containing nothing substantive that might invite a difficult question.
As for Walz, we know he is, ideologically, as perfect a twin to Kamala Harris as any of the candidates. From the reports of the VP interviews, we know that Walz disclaimed any personal ambitions beyond VP, and pledged to Harris he would do whatever she required of him. One staffer admitted Harris went with her “gut,” with an aid characterizing Harris’s decision as akin to choosing--wait for it--a husband.
So here’s the theory: All politicians are narcissistic, but the psychological literature makes a distinction between “grandiose” narcissists and “vulnerable” narcissists, and Harris has all the markings of a vulnerable narcissist. This would explain a lot because to the vulnerable narcissist, being greeted with anything other than flattery and sycophancy is not just insulting, as it is to the grandiose type. It is panic-inducing. This is because vulnerable narcissists are highly sensitive to the terrors of imposter syndrome--the dread that one’s incompetence will suddenly be exposed for all to see. The haughtiness of the vulnerable narcissist does not reflect confidence. Just the opposite. It is a defense against deep feelings of inadequacy. To someone with imposter syndrome, any kind of challenge presents a risk that her cover will be blown--that she will be exposed as an incompetent fraud. And it's terrifying.
It looks to me like Harris picked Walz because she trusts him, more than the others, not to expose her in an unflattering way. She trusts Walz to do her bidding loyally and not to challenge her in any way that might expose her as a fraud. It's the same fear of exposure that keeps her hiding from the press. It’s the same fear of exposure that limits her public statements to comically vacuous bromides. My hunch is that Harris is actually more afraid of being exposed as a fraud than she is of losing the election. So she picked Walz--not because he increases her chances of winning the Presidency-- but because Walz makes her feel that with him, as opposed to the others, her imposter’s mask will remain safely in place.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (19)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I have thought along similar lines but you’ve captured it more thoroughly. Totally plausible.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That's as good an analysis as any. Her pick would have to be a socialist, and she wouldn't want anyone who would/could upstage her. To her that'd mean someone superficially prettier. So Damien Newsom wouldn't be an alternative.
Assuming he'd take the job. I wonder why he wasn't mentioned in the speculation like Shapiro was.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I’m more cynical: Obama kept the Dem bench very light. Which of the (marginally capable) others on it would want to be either #2 to Kamala?or, wanted to be on a doubtful ticket (even taking into account their GOTV machine?) Except Kelly - who doesn't really seem to bright but wanted it desperately.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
They share the anti- Jew thing:
washingtonexaminer.com
Open link
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Good analysis, Ray. I think that Harris' campaign strategy is to hide from the media and let ballot harvesting do the magic. She knows that a generic Democrat polls better than a specific one and she is giving the people an unknown. Walz fits this strategy. Only the commies across America know him and his "charm" will be easy to hide under a basket for 2 months. Contrast that with Shapiro, who has too much charisma to hide and that will make it hard for her to hide. She has a great strategy and one that can only work without a primary. Obama has played this whole thing brilliantly and his fundamental transformation of America is leaping towards completion.
You're seeing five of 19 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.