Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The American Idea
Federalist Radio Hour
The Erick Erickson Show
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Daily Signal
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
I think most Republicans and conservatives were on the same page as me in opposing Democratic administrations that attempt to quash energy sources they dislike (fossil fuels) and subsidize those they like (wind and solar). It seemed the mainstream conservative view was that it's appropriate to have pollution standards, but we ought to let the free market figure out which energy sources worked best, and where. If something is clean enough and the economics work, great, but we shouldn't use the federal government to promote this and stifle that.
Now we have the Trump Administration giving away well over 600 million taxpayer dollars to prop up the coal industry. I'm happy that Donald Trump isn't trying to kill coal the way Obama and Biden were. I'm unhappy that he wants to subsidize coal. And, as usual, President Trump is not asking Congress to pass legislation to do this. He's using the Defense Production Act to do this. Is the Republican Party still a free-market party, or have Republicans decided that government picking winners and losers is fine, as long as they are in charge of it?
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (26)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
National defense and its dependence on a perpetually operative electric grid is a reasonable exception to this view under current conditions. Absolutely a vital element in federal government's role.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I think ethanol subsidies are worse . . .
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Is sugar still subsidized?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I have all kinds of electric suppliers sending me notices in the mail promoting clean wind and solar power. I'm waiting for one that says "We use coal, gas, and nukes to give you abundant, reliable, and affordable power".
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
And the public utilities that consume much of the products from fossil fuel providers including coal are highly regulated as state utilities so there is already a significant infringement to free market concepts among the coal industry customers.
You're seeing five of 26 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.