Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Leftists love to purge our language of words that offend them, such as "niggardly," which has nothing at all to do with any group of people other than misers, but sounds enough like another word for those who might be heavily melanin-laden. Another Leftist crusade against words is anything having a relationship to the word "man." The other day, I saw some woman blathering on about this subject after they launched six wife-men up into space. Sorry, let me use the updated elision of that term, "women." Anyway, my memory has blissfully purged itself of what she actually said. This memory erasure is probably a natural defense mechanism to keep me sane. Still, it was some objection to "man," perhaps in "mankind." Maybe she wanted "personkind," instead. This is worse nonsense than changing history to "herstory." History comes ultimately from Greek, which does not have the pronouns his and her, which are English words, and the etymology of the word history has nothing to do with the sexual equipment of the beings involved.
What makes replacing "man" even more ridiculous than replacing three letters from a Greek word that have nothing to do with an English pronoun? Like "history," "man" has nothing to do with sexual equipment. Man is the sex-neutral term in English. This might come as a surprise to many, but it is true. "Man" does not indicate masculinity or XY chromosomes. It is the all-encompassing term. Mankind literally means all humans of whatever sex. "Woman" is a term which means a female man. So, what is the term that means a male man? It seems to have gone missing. Does anyone know it?
In these latter days of the world, the word is only hinted at in a couple of compound words. The less common is wergeld, which is the price established in Anglo-Saxon law to pay to avoid retribution after injuring and killing a male man. The other word we have in English that preserves the word for a male man is werewolf. The old word was "wer." That was the original word for a male of the species called man. This is related to the Latin word "vir," which makes a much stronger showing in the English language in words like: virile, virility, triumvirate, and virtuous.
Thus, we find that the problem is not with the word man, but that the word wer has already been purged from our vocabularies. Let us reclaim our werhood and revive the old word. I am not merely a man, I am a wer. Will you stand with me in reviving this word and fighting the silliness of the Leftists in trying to destroy and erase one more word from our vocabularies?
Are there any good words that you would like to revive?
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (86)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yes, that is why that one tag is there.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
High Elvish, the whole language.
Shame I don't actually know it.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Best I have for you there is a writing system that should be revived for English rather than using these Latin characters.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I think ye should all sign on to my ye campaign, to restore English's plural second person pronoun to its rightful place in letters and literature. A lot of our Bible translation issues arise from the ambiguity created when you is used for plural cases not otherwise indicated. The original Bible languages, being primitive and therefore automatically inferior to the latest and greatest in all ways, do not suffer from this ambiguity. The old King James sees the ye revived, albeit inconsistently. A quick sampling suggests that it was used as much to very slightly shorten the word to fit the prosody rather than to didactly revive an archaic form.
Was Jesus addressing one apostle or all those present? Check the Greek or Latin, English is too decadent and lazy to retain fundamental distinctions.
You're seeing five of 86 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.