3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Not Merely a Man
April 23, 2025 at 8:30 PM

Not Merely a Man

Arahant
@Arahant

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark42likesJoin to like86comments

Leftists love to purge our language of words that offend them, such as "niggardly," which has nothing at all to do with any group of people other than misers, but sounds enough like another word for those who might be heavily melanin-laden. Another Leftist crusade against words is anything having a relationship to the word "man." The other day, I saw some woman blathering on about this subject after they launched six wife-men up into space. Sorry, let me use the updated elision of that term, "women." Anyway, my memory has blissfully purged itself of what she actually said. This memory erasure is probably a natural defense mechanism to keep me sane. Still, it was some objection to "man," perhaps in "mankind." Maybe she wanted "personkind," instead. This is worse nonsense than changing history to "herstory." History comes ultimately from Greek, which does not have the pronouns his and her, which are English words, and the etymology of the word history has nothing to do with the sexual equipment of the beings involved.

What makes replacing "man" even more ridiculous than replacing three letters from a Greek word that have nothing to do with an English pronoun? Like "history," "man" has nothing to do with sexual equipment. Man is the sex-neutral term in English. This might come as a surprise to many, but it is true. "Man" does not indicate masculinity or XY chromosomes. It is the all-encompassing term. Mankind literally means all humans of whatever sex. "Woman" is a term which means a female man. So, what is the term that means a male man? It seems to have gone missing. Does anyone know it?

In these latter days of the world, the word is only hinted at in a couple of compound words. The less common is wergeld, which is the price established in Anglo-Saxon law to pay to avoid retribution after injuring and killing a male man. The other word we have in English that preserves the word for a male man is werewolf. The old word was "wer." That was the original word for a male of the species called man. This is related to the Latin word "vir," which makes a much stronger showing in the English language in words like: virile, virility, triumvirate, and virtuous.

Thus, we find that the problem is not with the word man, but that the word wer has already been purged from our vocabularies. Let us reclaim our werhood and revive the old word. I am not merely a man, I am a wer. Will you stand with me in reviving this word and fighting the silliness of the Leftists in trying to destroy and erase one more word from our vocabularies?

Are there any good words that you would like to revive?

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (86)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Judge Mental@JudgeMental·1y
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·1y
    ReplyingtoJudge Mental

    Yes, that is why that one tag is there.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Saint Augustine@SaintAugustine·1y
    Arahant (View Post):
    Are there any good words that you would like to revive?

    High Elvish, the whole language.

    Shame I don't actually know it.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·1y
    ReplyingtoSaint Augustine

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Post):

    Arahant (View Post):
    Are there any good words that you would like to revive?

    High Elvish, the whole language.

    Shame I don’t actually know it.

    Best I have for you there is a writing system that should be revived for English rather than using these Latin characters.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Sisyphus@Sisyphus·1y

    I think ye should all sign on to my ye campaign, to restore English's plural second person pronoun to its rightful place in letters and literature. A lot of our Bible translation issues arise from the ambiguity created when you is used for plural cases not otherwise indicated. The original Bible languages, being primitive and therefore automatically inferior to the latest and greatest in all ways, do not suffer from this ambiguity. The old King James sees the ye revived, albeit inconsistently. A quick sampling suggests that it was used as much to very slightly shorten the word to fit the prosody rather than to didactly revive an archaic form.

    Was Jesus addressing one apostle or all those present? Check the Greek or Latin, English is too decadent and lazy to retain fundamental distinctions.

Scroll for later comments
+81 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 86 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •