Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Daily Signal
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Is there anything liberals want for which they are willing to do realistic cost/benefit analyses?
The answer seems to be "no." When they have a cause, liberals don't care about figuring out consequences and opportunity costs. This disinterest seems to underly their view of wind turbines and high-speed trains and mass transit; ditto for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF), organic food, DEI, ESG, COVID restrictions, gun ownership, and, well .... everything. "Good" things must be mandated. "Bad" things must be banned.
Where does that come from? Does it come from an inability to think critically? Or a belief that viewing things like a child does has its own virtue?
More importantly: is there any top-level way to fix the problem, short of crash courses in unintended consequences, comparative advantage, opportunity costs, and critical thinking? Is there any one kind of question that can help a liberal understand just how juvenile and pathetic their position is on any hot-button topic?
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (55)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
#2 son writes:
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
In answer to your question: Because it would expose the economic lunacy of their policy goals.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Because they are spending your money (time and treasure both, ) not theirs. And in pursuit of conquest your money is no object.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Too much math. Reduced opportunities for virtue signaling.
I think the "unintended" part of "unintended consequences" is their biggest hang-up. It doesn't matter how pure your heart is; printing money is inflationary.
You're seeing five of 55 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.