Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
It used to be that the privileged were those from wealthy families—those who had greater opportunities for education, better connections for jobs, and so on. One reason to work hard to succeed was to attempt to make your children members of the privileged class. The way to success was through success.
Now the privileged are "the oppressed." The way to get greater opportunities for education, better connections for jobs, and so on, is by demonstrating one's victimhood. Affirmative action and DEI have converted perceived oppression into real advantages. Now, the way to success is through failure.
The first model had its problems. But at least people were competing to be more successful. Now, people are competing at being bigger victims than others, which has created a race to the bottom and has contributed to social degeneration. Of course. If successful people are evil, and unsuccessful people are admirable, and oppressed people are privileged, then what will people do? And what will society look like in one generation? Two generations?
Affirmative action creates lots of problems for individuals, obviously. Putting students into schools that they can't handle, creating resentment among classmates and coworkers, moving people out of things that they're good at and moving them toward things they're not good at, etc.
But affirmative action's destructive impact on society should be a bigger point of emphasis.
We're destroying the greatest civilization the world has ever seen so that we can feel superior to others and feel better about ourselves.
Creating misery through vanity. Humans are good at this.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (25)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Tall poppy gets cut down first.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I don't know. Productive? Maybe with a lobotomy.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
A friend who worked for the IRS for 2 decades and has done independent CPA work on taxes for another 15 years was discussing how well off foreigners are.
Pull a muscle on the job, find a doctor of your ethnicity who has been friendly to such a life threatening ailment in the past, and within months, a Soc Security disability check is yours for the asking.
If you were born here, it often takes years to overcome the bureaucratic resistance to being approved.
He saw this quite often.
One household of people who had all been here less than ten years had an income of over 6,600 bucks each month. Remember, these are tax-free monies. There was only one person in the household who worked, and that individual bragged about how happy he was to know that should he get tired of his job, he had an easy out.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Idiocracy !
However, the true elites will still be pulling the strings . Only with a lot more manipulable underlings .
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Definitely true. It's how the left reconciled its abandonment of workers in favor of racial minorities and then, when they began to be too successful, sexual minorities.
And you have the peculiar phenomenon of very, very privileged people claiming to be oppressed because they're "non-binary." It's essentially meaningless, but it gives a white male or white female from a fabulously wealthy household, with an ivy-league education, a toehold in the all-important victimhood Olympics.
It also allows institutions to pretend to "diversity" by admitting or hiring such people. A UU church of my acquaintance agonized over the dreadful but ineluctable fact that the last three "settled" ministers had been white men. Despite this, given the chance, the search committee interviewed a number of women, but hired another white man...who had decided, the previous year, that he was "non-binary." Ta-dah!
You're seeing five of 25 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.