3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. QoTD: Socialism Brings Servitude
May 30, 2026 at 8:48 AM

QoTD: Socialism Brings Servitude

Susan Quinn
@SusanQuinn

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark15likesJoin to like29comments

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." -Alexis de Tocqueville

We live in times where many believe that it’s important to be equal to everyone else. In America, we were proud to settle for the goal of equality of opportunity; everyone could grow and prosper as much as they chose, if they were willing to do the hard work. It seemed like an honorable and achievable goal.

But today in America, too many people are lazy and greedy. They want to be equal to everyone else, but they expect equality and prosperity to be handed to them. There is little satisfaction in the work ethic, to enjoy the results of building something with your own hands. People prefer that others free themselves of their own wealth and present it to those with less.

Effectively, those who embrace socialism have little pride or self-worth. They feel no obligation to make a contribution to their own lives and to society. And those people who have more than they need “owe” others who have less.

To the socialists, that is a just society.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (29)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • MODERATOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Rodin@Rodin·20w

    Oh that the quote was true. Democracy is a mechanism of decision making. Direct democracy refers to a plebiscite for making decisions while representative democracy is a delegation of decision making from the people to representatives. The people or their representatives can adopt socialism as the means of organizing societal management. That they are giving up liberty in so doing may be a decision or an incremental impact as the people empowered by a decision to socialize aggregate more and more control to themselves.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·20w
    ReplyingtoRodin

    Rodin (View Comment):

    Oh that the quote was true. Democracy is a mechanism of decision making. Direct democracy refers to a plebiscite for making decisions while representative democracy is a delegation of decision making from the people to representatives. The people or their representatives can adopt socialism as the means of organizing societal management. That they are giving up liberty in so doing may be a decision or an incremental impact as the people empowered by a decision to socialize aggregate more and more control to themselves.

    I don’t see that happening. The state by its nature will continue to take power. As in NYC, the people may think that's what they want, until they realize what they've lost.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    namlliT noD@DonTillman·20w
    Susan Quinn (View Post):

    Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. –Alexis de Tocqueville

    This quote needs some context.

    And someone with a background in history would be much better at providing that context than I.

    Also, it appears this quote is from 1848, just a few months after Karl Marx coined the term socialism, in The Communist Manifesto, and maybe a French translation hadn't been published yet, so de Tocqueville's use of the word might be a little wonky.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Sisyphus@Sisyphus·20w
    ReplyingtonamlliT noD
    Susan Quinn (View Post):

    Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. –Alexis de Tocqueville

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    This quote needs some context.

    And someone with a background in history would be much better at providing that context than I.

    Also, it appears this quote is from 1848, just a few months after Karl Marx coined the term socialism, in The Communist Manifesto, and maybe a French translation hadn’t been published yet, so de Tocqueville’s use of the word might be a little wonky.

    The word first appears 20 years before as a juxtaposition with individualism.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Freeven@Freeven·20w

    Socialism begins and ends in tyranny. Those who possess wealth and power do not give it up willingly; it must be taken by force. Those wielding that force are similarly disinclined to give it up willingly.

Scroll for later comments
+24 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 29 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •