3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. A House of Race Cards
January 3, 2024 at 2:30 PM

A House of Race Cards

Rodin
@Rodin

MODERATOR

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark36likesJoin to like45comments

Billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman has had the scales drop from his eyes. His epilogue to Claudine Gay's Harvard presidency posted on X looks squarely at the problem that Diversity Equity and Inclusion ideology represents to our society:

I came to learn that the root cause of antisemitism at Harvard was an ideology that had been promulgated on campus, an oppressor/oppressed framework, that provided the intellectual bulwark behind the protests, helping to generate anti-Israel and anti-Jewish hate speech and harassment. Then I did more research. The more I learned, the more concerned I became, and the more ignorant I realized I had been about DEI, a powerful movement that has not only pervaded Harvard, but the educational system at large. I came to understand that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion was not what I had naively thought these words meant. I have always believed that diversity is an important feature of a successful organization, but by diversity I mean diversity in its broadest form: diversity of viewpoints, politics, ethnicity, race, age, religion, experience, socioeconomic background, sexual identity, gender, one’s upbringing, and more. What I learned, however, was that DEI was not about diversity in its purest form, but rather DEI was a political advocacy movement on behalf of certain groups that are deemed oppressed under DEI’s own methodology. *** An ideology that portrays a bicameral world of oppressors and the oppressed based principally on race or sexual identity is a fundamentally racist ideology that will likely lead to more racism rather than less. A system where one obtains advantages by virtue of one’s skin color is a racist system, and one that will generate resentment and anger among the un-advantaged who will direct their anger at the favored groups. The country has seen burgeoning resentment and anger grow materially over the last few years, and the DEI movement is an important contributor to our growing divisiveness. Resentment is one of the most important drivers of racism. And it is the lack of equity, i.e, fairness, in how DEI operates, that contributes to this resentment.

Ackman is taking a path that many earlier left-of-center thinkers have taken. Ackman, a Harvard alum and financial supporter of Harvard, was active in the wake of October 7 examining antisemitism at Harvard and other universities. His epilogue recounts his journey. He is not a conservative and no doubt will be looking for any excuse to continue to support Progressive politicians. But he has taken a major step in re-evaluating how his internal moral compass aligns (or not) with current Progressive thought.

This is the time to ally, the time to prioritize our issues and make common cause against the most problematic challenges to our Republic. Freedom of thought and expression, and the fact that those freedoms are fundamental and not a result of license by the State or any entity are at the pinnacle. Personal autonomy in our person and our property are just below the pinnacle and not licensed by the State. Limits on State action are critical to prevent violations and we must return to a point where the concept of "public good" does not violate personal autonomy, and police action for conflicts between persons are routinely dispassionate and operating within our constitutional restrictions on the State.

Bill Ackman isn't there yet, but let's take the "W" and build on it.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (45)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • Banned Member@BryanGStephens·2y

    He just now sees it?

    What a fool.

  • Banned Member@philo·2y
    Rodin (View Post):
    [Ackman:] "... The more I learned, the more concerned I became, and the more ignorant I realized I had been about DEI, a powerful movement that has not only pervaded Harvard, but the educational system at large. ..."

    I can only speak from my somewhat limited vantage point, but I see where it has pervaded...or been forced onto...many critical entities of large and medium sized corporate America. The effects on the educational system will be difficult to reverse, the effects on the (highly technical) corporate entities, I fear, will be largely irreversible.

    I have mentioned here several times about the coming dark age of sorts. Here you go. Good luck with that.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Paul Stinchfield@PaulStinchfield·2y
    ReplyingtoBryan G. Stephens

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    He just now sees it?

    What a fool.

    Maybe. Or maybe just an ignoramus: It is very common for business executives to be tightly focused on their business, relying excessively on establishment news for their opinions about social issues.

  • Banned Member@DrewInWisconsin·2y
    ReplyingtoPaul Stinchfield

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    He just now sees it?

    What a fool.

    Paul Stinchfield (View Comment):

    Maybe. Or maybe just an ignoramus: It is very common for business executives to be tightly focused on their business, relying excessively on establishment news for their opinions about social issues.

    There's a lot of that going around.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Globalitarian Misanthropist@Flicker·2y
    ReplyingtoPaul Stinchfield

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    He just now sees it?

    What a fool.

    Paul Stinchfield (View Comment):

    Maybe. Or maybe just an ignoramus: It is very common for business executives to be tightly focused on their business, relying excessively on establishment news for their opinions about social issues.

    People who know better, having been raised in, and the recipients of, the culture of colorblindness, have no excuse to revert back to skin color as a measure of human worth and potential.

Scroll for later comments
+40 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 45 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •