Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Those listening to academics and the mainstream media could easily believe Europe’s colonization of the Americas was an unmitigated evil. That the United States has foundations of genocide and theft, and peaceful natives were dispossessed by rapacious Europeans.
“Not Stolen: The Truth About European Colonialism in the New World,” by Jeff Fynn-Paul reveals this as a lie. Fynn-Paul shows how the historical record has been manipulated to create false conclusions about settler-native relations in the Americas.
The book has three major parts. The first examines the nature of the Europeans coming to America and their relationship with the natives. The second looks at the native peoples of America including their civilizations and relationships with each other. The third examines the displacement of Native Americans in the United States.
The first section explodes modern myths about the genocidal nature of the European settlement. Fynn-Paul reveals there was more assimilation between Europeans and Natives than we currently believe today. Native and Europeans worked together cooperatively. The “vanishing Indian” most often intermarried into and became part of a common culture.
The second exposes the myth of the peaceful, communal Native American, with enlightened civilizations at one with nature as a lie. The indigenous inhabitants of the Americas were as rapacious and environmentally abusive as their European cousins. Their civilizations were about 2000 years less advanced than European, on par with those of the Ancient Babylonians or Egyptians.
The third shows how Native Americans and Europeans built a mutually-beneficial society. Up through 1820 90% of the land acquired by Europeans was gained through purchase. Europeans and Indians fought wars with each other, but these were exceptions. Further, the wars waged between Indian and Indian were both more frequent and more violent than those between European and Indian.
He also shows those advancing these false narratives are deeply unserious people. Few of those most prominent in advancing these new theories are trained historians. Their backgrounds are frequently in sociology, anthropology and literature, and behave as if metaphor drives reality. He shows how they have reached a conclusion in advance and cherry-pick facts to fit, discarding any that contradict their pre-determined conclusion.
“Not Stolen” is a welcome rebuttal to today’s conventional narrative about European influence on the Americas. In a sense it is a 21st century version of “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds,” illustrating how popular intellectual fads can crowd out the facts.
“Not Stolen: The Truth About European Colonialism in the New World,” by Jeff Fynn-Paul, Bombardier Books, 2023, 412 pages, $35.00 (Hardcover), $23.00 (Paperback), $12.99 (E-book)
This review was written by Mark Lardas, who writes at Ricochet as Seawriter. Mark Lardas, an engineer, freelance writer, historian, and model-maker, lives in League City, TX. His website is marklardas.com.
Discussion (38)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I think I'll be picking up this book.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I just purchased the book and requested that our library order a copy.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Does it have maps or illustrations that would make the ebook version less accessible?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I did a quick web search for the author. The top result was a Foreign Policy article disputing something Jeff Fynn-Paul wrote for The Spectator website. No surprises there. But they provided a link for said article leading here.
Fynn-Paul's 2020 article opens:
How useful. One could use the app at homes of friends and relatives, places of employment, and so on. It has lots of game potential at parties.
Fynn-Paul goes on to poke holes in the current attitudes about interpreting history. It's surely a good preview of the book.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The mainstream view of Indians treats them as simple-minded savages who have no agency. There were Indians who wished to join European culture and assimilated. There were Indians who wished to stay separate but didn't want to fight. They either negotiated protections for themselves, which often were overrun by whites, or moved farther west. Then there were Indians who fought the whites in always futile attempts to defeat the European culture.
You're seeing five of 38 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.