3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Considering the Next Step
July 19, 2026 at 6:48 AM

Considering the Next Step

iWe
@iWe

CHARTER MEMBER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark8likesJoin to like3comments

What is the most important step a person can take?

The answer, of course, is – always – “the next step.”

Not everyone agrees. Most people don’t want to have to think that hard. Passivity and complacency are very attractive, and it is often coupled with some kind of fatalism. “Don’t worry,” says the fatalist. “G-d has this.” Or, “If I do nothing, I will be rewarded in the World to Come for my suffering.” Or even, “I did whatever I was told by an authority figure.” In all cases, we shirk personal responsibility, claiming that obedience and submission are what G-d (or “the universe”) wants from us. This path is much easier, because it does not demand that we change what we already instinctively want to do, which is to reduce our personal responsibility.

People who try to prioritize “the next step” are, on the other hand, inherently dissatisfied with passivity. We believe that we cannot sit on our laurels, or define our future merely by our past, or our genetics, or the way other people have treated us. No: If the next step is the most important one, then we are always supposed to be dissatisfied with the way things are right now, especially about ourselves. We must always try to find ways to step up and effect positive change, even when it comes with the risk of making different choices than other people.

The challenge of always trying to do better is intrinsically connected to conscious thinking and challenging oneself. Active evaluation and consideration (usually preceded by education and training) are essential preparatory steps before taking any positive action.

This can be seen in, for example, the application of justice. We have laws and processes precisely because having knee-jerk reactions to someone else’s behavior inevitably leads to mindless mob rule, like the Reign of Terror in the French Revolution. In a lawful society, we rely on a legal system despite its obvious limitations and flaws, because even a slow and error-prone legal system remains far, far better than anarchy.

This is true for any interpersonal interaction. For example, suppose that you want to bring someone a present, perhaps some flowers. If you take the easy, thoughtless path, you might grab whatever is handy and have someone deliver it.

If, on the other hand, you want the flowers to be received in the best possible way, you consider what would be best for that person and that occasion. And you would make sure that the flowers looked good – can you imagine bringing a bouquet of roses wherein one rose is obviously brown and dead? So the choosing of gifts requires thought and consideration and putting oneself in someone else’s shoes – all of which are hard to do well.

I think the same underlying principle applies to justice and to presents. The next step is the most important, and to do it right, you have to be conscious and thoughtful.

This is a subtext throughout the Torah. The Torah makes clear distinctions between things we do with conscious awareness, and the things we do mindlessly or accidentally. Indeed, the Torah (D. 17) specifically commands, “Justice, justice shall you pursue,” followed shortly after with “You shall not set up a sacred post—any kind of tree beside the altar of G-d,” with “You shall not sacrifice to [G-d] an ox or a sheep that has any bad defect.”

I think these are all related to the idea of the “next step.” Justice: We do not follow our urges and impulses when it comes to right and wrong; we instead have a legal system and processes. Tree worship: Nature is not the model for how society should be structured, and so we do not put nature on a pedestal. Offerings: We only bring presents that we have carefully considered and examined to ensure that they are not defective. We do not default to whatever is convenient or handy. All are combined in the same section of the text because they all share the same underlying requirement: think carefully about the next step before acting.

The Torah is telling us that we do not get to be complacent. We must not accept whatever we happen to feel in the moment, or a skin-deep understanding of the world, or even reckon that our offerings do not require careful consideration and preparation.

Judaism is always meant to be thoughtful, not to be practiced with mere reflexes or convenience. This applies to every aspect of our waking lives. Taking the next step demands no less.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by an editor.

Discussion (3)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Mark Camp@MarkCamp·12w
    iWe (View Post):

    What is the most important step a person can take?

    As stated it’s a meaningless question for multiple reasons.

    The function most_important_step(parameter1, parameter 2,…) is missing at least two parameters: goal, and sequence of steps. To turn this meaningless question into something closer to a meaningful one, you could change it to: “In order for person x to achieve goal y by a sequence of actions z, which of the members of z is most important?”

    For example, if the person’s goal is to bake bread, the most important step will likely be different than if his goal is to become a CPA.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    iWe@iWe·12w
    ReplyingtoMark Camp
    iWe (View Post):

    What is the most important step a person can take?

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    As stated it’s a meaningless question for multiple reasons.

    A person who asks: "What should I be doing now?" is way ahead of people who just let inertia and the path of least resistance govern their lives. Which is most people, most of the time.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Mark Camp@MarkCamp·12w
    ReplyingtoiWe
    iWe (View Post):

    What is the most important step a person can take?

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    As stated it’s a meaningless question for multiple reasons.

    iWe (View Comment):

    A person who asks: “What should I be doing now?” is way ahead of people who just let inertia and the path of least resistance govern their lives. Which is most people, most of the time.

    Amen.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •