Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
The basic idea of this post crystallized after observing certain Democratic candidates put forward by the DNC and boosted by the left-leaning chattering classes. I hope it's not too controversial to state here that I believe most of the political Left views conservatives and Republican voters without any nuance, but rather as one-dimensional, cartoonish parodies. A recent book titled Nothing Left: Confessions of a Democratic Operative by former Democrat Evan Barker touches on this idea tangentially.
Author "Evan" is actually a she. In her book, Barker talks about how she was essentially brainwashed into an absurdly distorted manner of thinking, typified by a paranoia toward Republicans. She was influenced by the view that Republicans truly were Nazi, Christo-Fascists planning to kill them — some unhinged stuff. As a result of this sort of political indoctrination, we have been left with many Democrats being reduced to very simplistic views in political discourse. Instead of having discussions with others on the opposite side, entertaining the thought of engaging with untouchables on the right side of the political spectrum is taboo.
Barker fortunately escaped her roles within the left political system. This occurred after being attacked for her openness to alternatives to viewing the world through a narrow Progressive lens. However, the DNC still is heavily influenced by this view. Some of it has shown up in candidate selections that I find condescending to ordinary American sensibilities. Instead of seeing the broader electorate with some humanity and deeper understanding, they tend to shoehorn voters with conservative tendencies into the more narrow view of identity politics and superficial signaling. The Democratic Party does this thinking they will peel off some votes to win elections. I'll give some examples to help illustrate.
Graham Platner in Maine
In some superficial ways Graham Platner checks certain boxes that a party operative may think appeals to a centrist or conservative. He was in the military, presents a "look" that might pass for a regular working guy. He claims to have traditionally masculine hobbies, and he speaks in a gruff, deep voice. When he started coming under pressure in his doomed campaign, there were some distasteful remarks made by Democrat operatives.
First, operatives seemed to believe that the sexual misconduct and physical abuse allegations, crude behavior, and Nazi tattoos might actually appeal to Republicans because they like that sort of thing. Second, I hear it claimed that Platner would tow the party line and that Democrats needed to hold the support for him to push him through to the finish. The polls said otherwise, and the DNC swapped him out last minute for another candidate — not the first time the party went to the bullpen late without input from primary voters. The excitement that was for Platner within the party — as this somewhat unbalanced, zany radical who could be presented as a traditional all-American who would get widespread appeal — is telling.
(I spared you his other photos and used his official website campaign photo. You're welcome)
James Talarico in Texas
The push for James Talarico in Texas, another Trojan horse of centrist moderation and sensibility, might be breaking down as well. Instead of wheeling this ruse into the walls of Texas Senate politics, it might just be left outside to rot. I think his campaign has already pivoted some of its messaging and delivery after a series of embarrassing revelations for a politician running for statewide office in Texas were released. But I can see why the Democrat Party would push Talarico so hard, given that they have no sense of the conservative voter.
Hey, don't those Bible-thumping, knuckle-dragging Republicans think that the "Jesus and God" thing is cool? Well, let's give them the most authentically Christian candidate ever. Aren't most Texan Republican voters bland vanilla males, monotonous yet somewhat articulate talkers with clean haircuts? If so, Talarico fits.
Don't Texans do that cowboy thing? Let's have Talarico in western boots and belt driving a Ram truck around. Oh, let's make sure he removes his COVID mask in 2026 before giving speeches on the campaign trail. The enthusiasm for the Democratic Party is that their "Great White Hope" will finally conquer Texas statewide politics. However, if the Dems are to take Texas, it will likely not be from lame candidates like James Talarico, but from demographic change and urban growth.
Tim Walz - VP Candidate and New Face of the Modern American Man
In its search for a VP candidate to balance the totally grassroots presidential run of Kamala Harris, the DNC settled on Tim Walz. Again, in a superficial sense, it could be said that he was the strong, macho American older white man to capture the voters outside the party. Wasn't the camouflage Harris-Walz hat that he wore while loading a shotgun on his crotch so cool!?
Walz is a war hero who led the Minnesota National Guard into battle in the Middle East — and conservatives love that jingoistic war slop, right? He was a respected head football coach, the leader and role model for developing boys. Red meat voters like football too. Yay sports! Voters love a guy who runs a pick-6 to victory. Walz says he's an avid hunter and outdoorsman just like those backwards rednecks who can be milked for votes. Walz's shortcoming in public speaking will be considered charming to bumbling Midwestern voters with limited vocabularies. On paper, the Democrat operative would think Walz is just the guy they need to take the flyover political scene by storm.
What are the Democrat Operatives Missing?
So what are the thought leaders and political operatives missing about conservatives and steady Republican voters? Well, I'd start with understanding. Instead, they seem to take us as seriously as the Borat character in those off-colored movies in which Sacha Baron Cohen goes around making a mockery of people while testing the limits of strangers' politeness and toleration. They don't understand what we think or why we believe what we believe. Instead, they treat us like unsuspecting rubes in a mockumentary. Even to sit down with a serious conservative in a sober, long-form discussion will frequently result in ostracism within Democratic circles. To take Republicans seriously and to make a good-willed effort in discussion is viewed as "legitimizing" the right — a grave sin. So instead you get superficial gestures and insulting caricatures.
As a result, you wind up with another ridiculous spectacle, not a Borat movie, but Democratic candidates looking to appeal to a broader American public.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (27)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Hmm...
Seems to me that if Democrats actually believed that Republicans were truly that dangerous then they would be putting electability first when choosing candidates rather than nominating extremist whackadoodles...
...unless of course they're pretty confident that extremist whackadoodles are the most electable options, which is even more disturbing.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
OK, now do a column about the view that some Republicans (and ricochet members) have about Democrats wanting to install a communist dictatorship, confine everybody to "15 minute cities", etc, etc.
There are just as many unhinged on the right as there are on the left.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yes, what's considered "electable" is at the heart of the issue here. Different views on this.
I will say that apparently on the Democrat with the DSA they are willing to swing for the fences in terms of becoming more mask off and just going for it outright. There was a recent interview where a DSA candidate honestly answered a series of questions. The DSA rise would displace the type of candidates referenced here for the most part. I supposed Platner is radical enough to be welcomed into DSA circles, but that may not be unanimous.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The DSA ones totally want those things.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Is this a serious special request? Because I might do something like that is people actually want it. Maybe not single topic issue though.
Because I do actually have an idea more or less formulated on sketching out the status of the Republican Party as sort of a thinking out loud brainstorming of things. One of the topics touches on what you mentioned.
Though to get back on the specific topic, I'm not sure the GOP actually runs candidates to cater to the stereotypes of the opposite side in high profile cases. Certain Republicans do tend to do soft version I suppose under pressure like offering government benefits, but just at lower levels etc. Basically stake out their positions based on Dem ones. Essentially afraid they can't be elected unless they operate within the Democrat Party framework. But this is a different phenomenon than what I'm referring to here.
You're seeing five of 27 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.