3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson Show3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Street Scenes 1970
July 17, 2025 at 6:30 AM

Street Scenes 1970

Gary McVey
@GaryMcVey

CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark41likesJoin to like45comments

That’s the title of what’s probably Martin Scorsese’s least-known film, even if there’s an asterisk attached: a student-made documentary whose most dramatic event was a moment when street violence between workers and students broke into the open, disappointing progressive dreams of solidarity. Only four months after the news cameras rolled, the finished film opened to some acclaim at the New York Film Festival, Sept. 15, 1970. I bet you’ve never heard of it. More about this to follow.

To far less acclaim, a movie called Joe opened 55 years ago, July 15, 1970. It was a cheapie, mostly forgotten, rather sleazy sex-and-violence hit that played drive-ins and second-run theaters. But due to its timely plot, it got national attention far beyond its shoestring $100,000 budget. It’s an early sketch of a Charles Bronson-style rage and revenge film. At a time of liberal resistance and despair, the movie Joe fed their most lurid fantasies about all the people out there who voted for Nixon. Those fantasies had enduring staying power. They live on today.

The plot of Joe wasn’t exactly Shakespearean. An angry, well-to-do New Yorker kills his daughter’s drug-peddling boyfriend. The impulsive deed impresses Joe, a hard-hat, blue-collar gun collector who dreams of war against hippies, which he (almost needless to say) finds an excuse to start. It was a show-off role for Peter Boyle, who made the most of it. It was also a very early Susan Sarandon film. Not sure she’s eager to have it show up in her resume. Director John G. Avildsen picked up the Best Director Oscar six years later for Rocky.

I met “Marty” Scorsese (as we once knew him) around Easter time, 1969. My mom and I were getting a guided tour of the NYU film school, where I was admitted for the fall semester. I was seventeen. We saw Marty give a class in studio A of the 8th floor of East Building, and after lunch we saw him again lecturing at a small movie theater, 144 Bleeker Street. He was friendly, sparing a few minutes to chat with me and my mother about film school. When I told him I was a student at Bishop Reilly High School, he said he was a graduate of the Catholic Cardinal Hayes High School, a well-known NYC school that one of my uncles attended. This wasn’t quite the Scorsese you see at the Oscars.

There are doctoral dissertations about “the” Scorsese editing technique, variously interpreted, his patterns of montage, his intuitive sense of tension and release. His work deserves and rewards that level of artistic scrutiny. But there’s another, earlier level of personal style in the editing room that deserves mention: To the interest and amusement of his NYU students, Marty showed them how to “play” a clanky, old-fashioned upright Moviola editing machine with the energy and expertise of an athlete or a musician.

Long before video or computers were factors in film editing, the Moviola was used for about a half century. It was noisy, clattery, and simple, on the tech level of a sewing machine. That method of putting films together was becoming an obsolete craft even then. It was a lousy way to see a movie but an easy, unpretentious way of testing tentative edits, if you knew how to use the foot pedals and handbrake in coordination with a set of toggle switches. Martin Scorsese, master of American cinema, started out as a guy who could jump on the pedals and brake of the editing machine like Roger Daltrey playing pinball in Tommy.

Scorsese edited Woodstock, the documentary concert film that was a hit in spring 1970, working with Thelma Schoonmaker, who’d be his editor for, well, forever. With Street Scenes, although Scorsese supervised the project, he wasn’t there and couldn’t be with all of the scattered film crews. He acted more as generalissimo and chief editor. I doubt that any other feature-length film went from fresh cans of Kodak film to the red carpet of a major festival premiere as quickly.

1970s campuses were already primed to explode. Mine literally did in March, when a homemade bomb killed its radical builder and leveled a Greenwich Village townhouse. When four students were killed at Kent State University on May 4th, many colleges ground to a halt all over the country.

On May 8, on Wall Street, a flash mob of union workers in construction and other trades attacked a march protesting the Kent State shooting, ultimately beating up crowds of spectators and pedestrians, all caught on the 16mm cameras of Scorsese’s student film crews. It wasn’t a case of “fight back;” this was a brief spark of blue-collar antifa. But at a time when street violence always seemed to come from the other side, even unfairly hitting the wrong target at least felt like hitting back, for some people.

The Street Scenes production was incorporated as New York Cinetracts Collective, a name that now reads as tragicomic Marxiness. Postage for all of its mass mailings that year was generously comped by Scorsese’s agent at William Morris, Harry Ufland, which is why their dramatic anti-capitalist announcements all bore the enthusiastic postmark of “The Agency of the Show World!”

The nationally publicized “Hard Hat Riots” filmed in Street Scenes were swiftly worked into the promotion of Joe. New poster art showed Joe cradling a gun, wearing a hard hat with an American flag on it. He’s also holding a flag in one hand and a target in the other. The slogan was “Keep America Beautiful.” You could put that summer-of-‘70 poster of a murderous rifleman hunting hippies up on a wall in Brooklyn today, and people would instantly claim to recognize it as depicting a Trump supporter.

Americans were tired of Dragnet-style, polite, businesslike cops. Audiences were ready for Seventies-style badasses who’d throw away the rule book to clean up the streets. Dirty Harry didn’t endorse vigilantes, but audiences did.

Strictly from the film marketing standpoint, Joe had some contradictions working against it. The people most likely to go along with the naked and stoned semi-orgy scenes, urban liberals, were horrified by the violence. The audiences most likely to cheer for massacring hippies were shocked by the nudity. But there was enough of a double positive on sex and violence to reap a box office that was 180 times Joe’s budget.

The tumult of 1970 was deeply, lastingly counterproductive for American progressives. Everything they did boosted the poll numbers of the loathed, despised Nixon, whom they felt had won 1968 on a fluke, backed by the country’s haters. They expected 1972 to be a pushover, yet they could see the country was slipping away.

One sign of the growing backlash—that phenomenon had a name now--was meant to be a comedy takedown, All in the Family, first airing in January 1971. Archie Bunker was the dismissive, non-heroic image of the WWII-age veteran: paunchy, casually racist, crudely ignorant. A figure of fun and of scorn. But the creators of the show were bemused that they’d inadvertently made Archie a hero for tens of millions. Of course, I don’t mean “hero” too literally; everybody knew that Archie went too far. That was the whole point of the joke, working-class white-wise. But we ruefully recognized something of ourselves in Archie Bunker.

By 1973, Jack Lemmon won an Academy Award playing a garment industry executive in Save the Tiger (also directed by John Avildsen, of Joe and later, Rocky). It was another, more thoughtful update of the Hollywood image of the WWII vet, truer and more positive.

A minor coincidence: Scorsese’s first paying job on a film crew was being part of a short film that John G. Avildsen made in 1964. He joked later that he thought it might be the only time in his life when he’d ever get to work in 35mm, the Hollywood film standard.

This proved not to be the case.

Marty's low-low budget, years-in-the-making first dramatic feature, 1967's Who's That Knocking at My Door, starring Harvey Keitel. Scorsese did get to film some 35mm scenes, tacky and tacked-on fantasy sequences shot in Amsterdam. It was not, as you can see, always given an art house release.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (45)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DaveSchmidt@DaveSchmidt·1y

    Thank you for the mini lesson.

  • CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Gary McVey@GaryMcVey·1y
    ReplyingtoDaveSchmidt

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Thank you for the mini lesson.

    Thanks for reading, Dave! 1970 was one of those hinges of history. It was strange living through it. It was a brutal year for the optimistic left, because objectively, it largely went Nixon's way, much as 2025 is so far largely going Trump's way. They expected to lose the occasional election; they never expected to lose so much control of popular culture, so quickly.

    We went from the New York of Funny Girl to the New York of Death Wish in six years. We went from good vibes and free love of Woodstock to the biker stomping gangs and rape of Gimme Shelter in a year.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Judge Mental@JudgeMental·1y

    Kent State presents an interesting parallel to what's currently happening. The left loves to portray it as a case of ravening stormtroopers indiscriminately gunning down peaceful protestors, people who had done nothing to earn such treatment. The reality was quite different. The guardsmen were surrounded on all sides, and had been pelted with rocks, bricks and bottles for hours, injuring more than half them, before they finally opened fire.

    We see similar things going on in recent times. Take the federal building in Portland, where in 2020 there were sustained attacks for about 100 straight nights. On several occasions, the exits were barricaded, with the rioters attempting to set the building ablaze. Clearly an attempt to murder those within. We're seeing some similar behavior starting with some of ICE facilities this year.

    It's a pattern of the left, invariably claiming the moral high ground for whatever happens to match their own political preferences, while engaging in clearly reprehensible behavior in pursuit of those preferences. If they manage to produce a similarly violent episode, I have no doubt they will portray it exactly as they do Kent State.

  • CONTRIBUTOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Seawriter@Seawriter·1y

    I remember Joe. Perhaps I was sort of the audience for it, but it left me unimpressed. (I was in my teens and had barely escaped getting beaten up by antiwar hippies in my hometown of Ann Arbor.) Saw the poster (which is what I remember most), read the synopsis, and skipped the movie. (Although I remember it sold a lot of seats in Ann Arbor. Probably so the hippies could boo it.)

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Muleskinner, Weasel Wrangler@Muleskinner·1y
    ReplyingtoGary McVey

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Thank you for the mini lesson.

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Thanks for reading, Dave! 1970 was one of those hinges of history. It was strange living through it. It was a brutal year for the optimistic left, because objectively, it largely went Nixon’s way, much as 2025 is so far largely going Trump’s way. They expected to lose the occasional election; they never expected to lose so much control of popular culture, so quickly.

    We went from the New York of Funny Girl to the New York of Death Wish in six years. We went from good vibes and free love of Woodstock to the biker stomping gangs and rape of Gimme Shelter in a year.

    And five years to “Ford to City: Drop Dead.” We’re not likely headed for a repeat of history, but it definitely will, at least, rhyme.

Scroll for later comments
+40 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 45 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •