3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Stop the Negotiations
August 24, 2024 at 9:02 AM

Stop the Negotiations

Susan Quinn
@SusanQuinn

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark16likesJoin to like28comments

The negotiations between Israel and Gaza are an unmitigated disaster. But no one wants to admit it. Although of all the parties, Hamas has gotten the closest to saying the truth, stating the efforts are a “waste of time.” Whether in the next few weeks or in the year ahead, these efforts are doomed. Israel is trying to execute the war under the weight of U.S. demands, and Hamas is sitting back, watching the whole charade and knowing that it will collapse. Below is a link to a stunning video from Paul Stinchfield, who was present at this speech at the U.N. that describes the basis of this disaster.

View post on X

How did we get to this point?

To begin, the U.S. should have minded its own business. Throughout the conflict, our country is certain that it knows the best way to carry out this war, and they have been proven wrong many times. As examples, they blamed Israel for not letting humanitarian aid through, ignoring that Hamas has stolen shipments for their own people. The U.S. stated that the Israelis would require weeks to move the Palestinians out of Khan Younis, when the Israelis completed the job in a fraction of the time. The U.S. also has conflicting goals, since they are probably more concerned with the November elections and having a “win” in the Middle East than they are with the Israelis being successful. And the U.S. has no right to make demands on how Israel should conduct the war; Israel is an independent country.

Meanwhile, the war drags on because there are no terms that will satisfy both sides. (You can read this article if you want the details of the May agreement.) These are the key differences:

  1. Hamas essentially wants a permanent ceasefire; Israel will not agree, since they cannot trust Hamas to stop attacking Israel and Israelis. In addition, a permanent cease-fire would signal to all those entities sympathetic to Hamas that they have beaten Israel. Let’s not forget that Senior Hamas Official, Gazi Hamad said the following:
‘Israel is a country that has no place on our land. We must remove that country, because it constitutes a security, military, and political catastrophe to the Arab and Islamic nation, and must be finished. We are not ashamed to say this, with full force.... The Al-Aqsa Flood [the name Hamas uses to describe its attack on Israel] is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth...’
  1. Israel wants all the hostages to be released at once. Hamas disagrees, since they prefer to release them in stages to give them leverage. Meanwhile, hostages are dying in captivity; some of the deaths have been verified. Forces inside Israel who hate Netanyahu are insisting that the families of hostages demand a complete cease fire and release of all the hostages, even though this agreement would not be acceptable to either side.
  2. The negotiators were a bizarre selection: Qatar is an ally of Hamas and can't be an effective arbiter; Egypt allowed Hamas for years to transport weapons through tunnels into Gaza. Israel wants to maintain control of the Philadelphi corridor where over 50 tunnels have been built; Hamas wants the corridor back.
  3. Hamas demanded an exorbitant number of prisoners be released from Israeli jails; although they modified this number, they have insisted on the release of some of the most dangerous criminals. It’s important to remember that Sinwar, now head of the political side of Hamas, was imprisoned in Israel years ago and was released in a swap, only to become the creator of the October 7 debacle.
  4. Israel must be given the weapons they need to bring this war to an end. Although there have been assurances that weapons have been ordered, it’s unclear whether those weapons have actually been delivered to Israel.
  5. There is one issue where Hamas and Israel agree: neither wants an independent Palestinian state.

There are other conditions that make reaching an agreement nearly impossible. Hamas will not reject its original mission to destroy the Jewish state. The U.S. must take steps to stop Iran’s involvement. They must make Iran pay dearly, by bombing oil wells and stopping the sending of funds, to discourage Iran from supplying their proxies. The U.S. persists in threatening Israel with negative consequences, but it refuses to hold Hamas accountable for its actions. For example, Hamas carried out a suicide bombing in Tel Aviv recently:

The backpack of explosives went off early, killing only the bomber, but the blast could have inflicted mass casualties at a nearby synagogue or soccer stadium. This was Hamas’s response to Mr. Biden’s offer. Hamas vowed Monday to carry out more suicide bombings, as it did throughout the 1990s—the last time it was trying to kill a peace deal—and the early 2000s. Mr. Biden’s answer is more talks. With or without Hamas, negotiators will soon be off to Cairo for another round.

The U.S. refuses to see that this negotiation is doomed to failure. The Left, in particular, believes as long as they just keep talking, there’s hope for a resolution. Joe Biden has given mixed signals about supporting Israel, and Kamala Harris didn't appear for Netanyahu’s speech to Congress when he spoke to that body. Then there was this most recent comment:

Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Monday that the latest Cairo summit is ‘probably the best, maybe the last, opportunity to get the hostages home, to get a cease-fire, and to put everyone on a better path to enduring peace and security.’ How many times can the Administration say this without embarrassment?

Stop the negotiations.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (28)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    The Reticulator@TheReticulator·2y

    You could write a parallel article by substituting Russia for Hamas and Ukraine for Israel. There would still be a few details to edit, and the situation in Israel may be on a faster track to a horrible end than the one in Ukraine, but the general idea is much the same.

    One thing that would help all around would be for Blinken to resign in disgrace.

  • MODERATOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Rodin@Rodin·2y

    “To begin, the U.S. should have minded its own business.”

    Seems like an evergreen observation.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·2y
    ReplyingtoThe Reticulator

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    One thing that would help all around would be for Blinken to resign in disgrace.

    Agree with your comparison. And especially like your suggestion...

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·2y
    ReplyingtoRodin

    Rodin (View Comment):

    “To begin, the U.S. should have minded its own business.”

    Seems like an evergreen observation.

    Would "minding our own business" include not selling them weapons?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·2y
    Replyingtokedavis

    Rodin (View Comment):

    “To begin, the U.S. should have minded its own business.”

    Seems like an evergreen observation.

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Would “minding our own business” include not selling them weapons?

    Are we selling the weapons or giving them away?

Scroll for later comments
+23 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 28 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •