Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
The negotiations between Israel and Gaza are an unmitigated disaster. But no one wants to admit it. Although of all the parties, Hamas has gotten the closest to saying the truth, stating the efforts are a “waste of time.” Whether in the next few weeks or in the year ahead, these efforts are doomed. Israel is trying to execute the war under the weight of U.S. demands, and Hamas is sitting back, watching the whole charade and knowing that it will collapse. Below is a link to a stunning video from Paul Stinchfield, who was present at this speech at the U.N. that describes the basis of this disaster.
How did we get to this point?
To begin, the U.S. should have minded its own business. Throughout the conflict, our country is certain that it knows the best way to carry out this war, and they have been proven wrong many times. As examples, they blamed Israel for not letting humanitarian aid through, ignoring that Hamas has stolen shipments for their own people. The U.S. stated that the Israelis would require weeks to move the Palestinians out of Khan Younis, when the Israelis completed the job in a fraction of the time. The U.S. also has conflicting goals, since they are probably more concerned with the November elections and having a “win” in the Middle East than they are with the Israelis being successful. And the U.S. has no right to make demands on how Israel should conduct the war; Israel is an independent country.
Meanwhile, the war drags on because there are no terms that will satisfy both sides. (You can read this article if you want the details of the May agreement.) These are the key differences:
‘Israel is a country that has no place on our land. We must remove that country, because it constitutes a security, military, and political catastrophe to the Arab and Islamic nation, and must be finished. We are not ashamed to say this, with full force.... The Al-Aqsa Flood [the name Hamas uses to describe its attack on Israel] is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth...’
There are other conditions that make reaching an agreement nearly impossible. Hamas will not reject its original mission to destroy the Jewish state. The U.S. must take steps to stop Iran’s involvement. They must make Iran pay dearly, by bombing oil wells and stopping the sending of funds, to discourage Iran from supplying their proxies. The U.S. persists in threatening Israel with negative consequences, but it refuses to hold Hamas accountable for its actions. For example, Hamas carried out a suicide bombing in Tel Aviv recently:
The backpack of explosives went off early, killing only the bomber, but the blast could have inflicted mass casualties at a nearby synagogue or soccer stadium. This was Hamas’s response to Mr. Biden’s offer. Hamas vowed Monday to carry out more suicide bombings, as it did throughout the 1990s—the last time it was trying to kill a peace deal—and the early 2000s. Mr. Biden’s answer is more talks. With or without Hamas, negotiators will soon be off to Cairo for another round.
The U.S. refuses to see that this negotiation is doomed to failure. The Left, in particular, believes as long as they just keep talking, there’s hope for a resolution. Joe Biden has given mixed signals about supporting Israel, and Kamala Harris didn't appear for Netanyahu’s speech to Congress when he spoke to that body. Then there was this most recent comment:
Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Monday that the latest Cairo summit is ‘probably the best, maybe the last, opportunity to get the hostages home, to get a cease-fire, and to put everyone on a better path to enduring peace and security.’ How many times can the Administration say this without embarrassment?
Stop the negotiations.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (28)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You could write a parallel article by substituting Russia for Hamas and Ukraine for Israel. There would still be a few details to edit, and the situation in Israel may be on a faster track to a horrible end than the one in Ukraine, but the general idea is much the same.
One thing that would help all around would be for Blinken to resign in disgrace.
MODERATOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
“To begin, the U.S. should have minded its own business.”
Seems like an evergreen observation.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Agree with your comparison. And especially like your suggestion...
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Would "minding our own business" include not selling them weapons?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Are we selling the weapons or giving them away?
You're seeing five of 28 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.