3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Civilization’s Discontents
January 4, 2025 at 7:32 AM

Civilization’s Discontents

iWe
@iWe

CHARTER MEMBER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark16likesJoin to like16comments

When a civilization loses its connection to a core mission, then it becomes unmoored. Distractions from that mission degrade execution and competence at all levels: Corporations (who are told profits are evil) get distracted by DEI – and their competence falls. The military is told it must lead social change, and it embraces DEI – only to be humiliated when it is asked to fight a war. On a personal and familial level, when people forget (or never learned) that the greater purpose of a single person is to build deep and meaningful familial and community relationships, they instead get bogged down in their own narcissism.

When that happens, lacking any big motivational or societal goals, people stop taking marriage seriously, stop having children, and search for new neuroses to haunt our dreams and provide the corrosive fears (e.g. climate change, Covid, etc.) that are the dime-store substitutes for shared investment in a constructive communal project. Without a mission, society folds.

This is not new. Every time a primitive society was “rescued” when the West brought food, it collapsed. If your entire culture is built around surviving at the edge of extinction from starvation and disease, then nothing makes any sense once that central challenge has been taken off the table. Primitive societies have no higher ideals: Their people are too hungry to concern themselves with abstract problems.

Today’s richer societies are now deeply mired in the same problem, writ large. None of the wealthy nations in the world have so far solved the problem of how to motivate a population who no longer fear starvation.

(The only rich nation that today has substantially higher than replacement levels of children is Israel – and the most plausible explanation is not solely the religious angle. It is instead that Israel is still motivated by the oldest ambition of mankind, the ambition shared with all primitive cultures in human history: mere survival.)

This is not because there are no worthy higher causes. There most certainly are!

Religions, at least Islam and Christianity and Judaism, offer competing (though not always compatible) visions and missions that can motivate people to see that there are more important things than their deep-down gender preferences.

Nationalism provides a higher cause as well. Europe conquered the world at least in part because there was so much competition, driven in part by nationalism and religious sectarianism. (Arguably the EU, by seeking to end nationalism in Europe, has sapped Europe’s vitality.)

More recently, Communism vs. Democracy provided a grander mission that people could believe in, on one side or the other. And war is a sensational motivator, even if conducted through proxies like the Space Race. At least in time of war, passions are inflamed. And people procreate – see the Baby Boom.

But now the missions have decayed and rotted away. People no longer believed deeply in them: The “isms” like Communism and Socialism and even Zionism aged out after 70 years. Europe’s competing countries have become the oatmeal mush of the EU, so birth rates are plummeting. Christianity is nicer than ever before – and the result is stagnation. The list goes on and on. Few Americans can even articulate what the mission of America is, and as a result, much of what passes for a national mission is little more than xenophobia.

Vivek talks and writes consistently about trying to restore a higher purpose to America. As a Catholic-educated Hindu, he grasps the paradox of a mission being critical to societal success even if you don’t think the mission is ultimately “true.” Jordan Peterson and Mark Steyn and even Richard Dawkins have all said very similar things: They are not sure if they believe, but they certainly want everyone else to believe!

Because having a mission matters. But not all missions are equal. Global Warming Apocalypters don’t get us anywhere, and they, along with their co-religionist Wokers, are not having children anyway. They are modern-day Shakers, unable to reproduce, and so ultimately are merely dead ends in human history. And their evangelism promotes the overall woke mind-virus.

Communism and DEI and racial purity are similarly not missions that any free person should welcome and accept, because they don’t lead to the improvement of humanity on this earth. Islam certainly gets people fired up, and sometimes even blown up. It does not offer a winning mission statement if we believe in a future that is better than the present.

The paradox is that, consciously or not, powerful people and governments the world over are not even acting in their own long-term best interests. Instead of helping to find productive causes that can motivate their people, they are suppressing the free speech of all who believe in traditional values. Instead, they promote pablum that enhances their short-term power, but at the cost of long-term decline and the death of civilization as we know it.

Traditionally, unfree societies suppressed free speech because they had a mission, and would not countenance any competing ideas. No citizen of the Soviet Union or Red China or Nazi Germany could repeatedly question Stalin or Mao or Hitler. Those societies had a vision, and they promoted it ruthlessly, to the exclusion of all else. Even Ancient Egypt blocked external ideas, and they did so for thousands of years – when Pharoah invited the Hebrews to move in, he specifically told them to leave all their things behind: Egypt wanted to limit the intrusion of everything foreign as much as it could (the migrants were even settled remotely from the natives). Of all of these named totalitarian societies, the Egyptians were the most successful at isolating themselves. But of course the Egyptians did not have the internet, or even the printing press, to contend with.

Elon Musk, on the other hand, has a mission: He wants to get to Mars. That is an echo of the 1960s Space Race, and worked well enough with that generation. Musk also understands that mankind needs to reproduce. Musk is doing his part when it comes to reproduction, having fathered at least 12 children.

For me, all the “good” missions have to be rooted in the text of the Torah – those principles are summarized here. The Torah is all about creating and building and investing in meaningful relationships with each other and with G-d. Of course, this may be too abstract for most people – which is why the Torah is partially really only for Jews (and its message has not been resoundingly successful even among my own co-religionists).

But whatever we do, we need to get to it quickly. In order to be saved, the West needs to figure this out, and soon. Steyn correctly identifies that demography is destiny, so unless and until people start believing in something more than themselves before we are biologically incapable of kick-starting the birth curve, then civilization’s death spiral will end in a smoking crater.

P.S. One might even argue that Javier Milei’s economic goals are religious in origin, even though Argentina is not a wealthy nation and can be motivated primarily by the desire for economic survival.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (16)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·1y

    Corporations have a fiduciary obligation to their shareholders. BlackRock, State Street, et. al base their investments on the ESG (environmental, social, and government) rating of the firm. Up until lately, having a good ESG meant access to short term loans and there was no downside. Then certain companies like Bud Light's AB InBev and Harley-Davidson found themselves in bad odor with their customers. Not a profitable place to be.

    Likewise, the military has started worrying about DEI concerns and lost sight of their core mission: killing people and breaking their stuff.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    iWe@iWe·1y
    ReplyingtoPercival

    Percival (View Comment):

    Up until lately, having a good ESG meant access to short term loans and there was no downside.

    I do not believe this is correct. I have heard it from CEOs, in public, multiple times: "the next time I get better terms because of our ESG score will be the first time."

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·1y
    ReplyingtoiWe

    Percival (View Comment):
    Up until lately, having a good ESG meant access to short term loans and there was no downside.

    iWe (View Comment):

    I do not believe this is correct. I have heard it from CEOs, in public, multiple times: “the next time I get better terms because of our ESG score will be the first time.”

    Then they're doing it because it provides a competitive benefit? Yeah, no. It doesn't.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Sisyphus@Sisyphus·1y

    They do it to minimize liability in the face of the most insanely politicized DoJ in human history, and after Biden's loud denunciation of AG Garland as being way too easy on Biden's enemies list, the CEOs were right to be worried.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·1y
    ReplyingtoSisyphus

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    They do it to minimize liability in the face of the most insanely politicized DoJ in human history, and after Biden’s loud denunciation of AG Garland as being way too easy on Biden’s enemies list, the CEOs were right to be worried.

    That makes a little more sense, but at what cost? I wasn't required to attend any DEI struggle training sessions at my last employer, but I got an earful from others and oooh baby, it's a wonder the ears of the HR Department employees didn't burn right off their skulls. They weren't eliminating toxicity from the work environment, they were perfecting it.

Scroll for later comments
+11 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 16 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •