Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
“All I wanted to do was argue.” So said a student in the first session of my public university course, “Argumentative Writing.” He was however surprised – in his words, “caught off guard” – by the first two sessions I taught on “Humility” and “Charity.” For instance, about humility, I said our arguments should be gracious, considerate, careful to represent other ideas with accuracy. And I said about charity that communication is a community-based, convivial, invitational work of intellectual hospitality. Turns out, students had only thought about a course on argumentation as a knock-down-drag-out verbal brawl. My teaching was based on listening, care for others, and broadmindedness – concepts these students were not accustomed to. You can view the two videos where I introduce these concepts via links at the end of this Truth in Two.
Those who know me well will think it is no wonder that I would take a non-combative approach to persuasion. Though I enjoy conversation and discussion, I don’t like conflict and I don’t like to argue in anger. But unbeknownst to students, my approach in the class was not based on my own personality but upon biblical truths - Proverbs set the tone of dialogue. Proverbs 15.33 says, “The fear of the Lord is instruction in wisdom and humility comes before honor.” And as for charity, Proverbs 15.23 is clear, “To make an apt answer is a joy to a man and a word in season, how good it is!” Christians should carefully consider graciousness in our conversations rather than an argumentative spirit. Don’t forget that at His first public reading of Scripture it was said of Jesus’ hearers, “They marveled at the gracious words coming from his mouth.” Disputation and disagreement are important in life. But our argumentation should be woven with humility and charity. For the Comenius Institute, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, Executive Director of the Center for Biblical Integration at Liberty University, personally seeking truth wherever it’s found. [First published at MarkEckel.com]
LINKS
Humility Video Link
Charity Video Link
Discussion (12)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Mark, you're just wrong. You should never argue with Humility and Charity. When those two gang up on you, you're definitely in trouble. Argue with Hope, instead. She's bad news. 😉
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Unfortunately, that's all many of them know. We live in a world in which the premise of laying out a disagreement about something has been conflated with the notion of "Let's start a fight to the death!" It's actually impossible to argue sanely or even just productively with someone who's determined to start a fight to the death. Such a person is hard-wired to dismiss anything you say with extreme prejudice, and to escalate going forward, neither of which approaches is helpful to a peaceful or meaningful resolution.
Bless you. That's the college world I grew up in, one that's become all too rare these days. But I think it was more humane--and inclusive--than the one that exists today.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
This is beautiful. Thanks.
Books should be written and careers founded on expounding the theme. But reading this short note, with just two verses from the Old and one from the New Testament, is like seeing a river near its source.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Well said, She!
11@ Clauses, Persuasive [1]
1@ Clauses, Performative [2]
* * *
[1] I agree with all. My favorite:
[2] The blessing. I add my voice to it.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
This should be posted with the Ricochet COC as aspirational for all here. A diplomatic approach to argumentation is more persuasive than the typical leftist tactic I call argument by insult.
You're seeing five of twelve comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.