Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Why do sharks take bites out of people? Standard Answer: sharks don't eat people, silly! They just confuse those legs for seals.
How do we know? Do we run post-chomping interviews, like in a reality TV show, and ask the shark, "Gee, what were you thinking when you decided to sample Jennifer's legs?"
Who needs common sense? It turns out that we now know why orcas are attacking boats. Because, dear foolish reader, the orcas are merely having fun.
"Killer whales are known to play with other objects or animals in their environment to the point of damaging them (in the southern resident killer whale population of Washington, USA, which feed on salmon, individuals will ‘play’ with harbour porpoises to the point of killing them, which may be a similar escalation of an initially less harmful interaction), so this behaviour seems on that spectrum," the scientists wrote.
Oh. That's alright, then. Just like any adolescent boy who throws cement blocks off an overpass to see what happens.
"The singular agreement amongst the experts at this workshop is that the interactions between Iberian killer whales and vessels are not aggressive. The interactions have more elements consistent with fad behaviour or play/socialising than aggression. The use of such terms as ‘attack’ to describe these interactions is thus inappropriate, misleading and should cease."
I used to have a dog, a huge german shepherd/wolf mix, who, using the same logic, thought kittens were delightful, the perfect cure for the isolation of being a lone Big Dog. He wanted to be their friend. He would even pick them up with his mouth and carry them around inside, like a proud uncle. Mysteriously, the kittens never survived the experience.
This anthropromorphization of the animal kingdom is insane.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (15)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
As someone who has surfed what a shark see's is a surfboard that has an outline shaped like a seal, especially when it is beneath you. They adapt to both cold and warm waters. If there are seals in an area there is a very good chance, that there will be sharks in the area.
When it comes to bears, mountain lions, and to a lesser extent wolves they see human beings as either prey or competitors in their territory.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I agree that, in general, the attribution of human characteristics, thought processes, behavior, and emotion to members of the animal kingdom is absurd.
Still, I see nothing wrong with observing animal behavior and--when parallels can be drawn with our own--in drawing them. And I see nothing wrong with--for young children, especially--say, the stories of Beatrix Potter who was, herself, an entirely rational woman with no faux sentimentality when it came to her four-legged friends. Many of them suffered consequences or came to sticky ends in her stories, just like her own pet rabbit (Peter) whose carcass she boiled after his natural death (no Fatal Attraction jokes, please) so that she could retrieve his bones, assemble his skeleton, and better represent the structure and movements of the lagomorphs in her watercolor paintings of them.
Or in using animal tales as vehicles to drive home, at one remove, parabolic lessons of admirable and not-so-admirable cross-species behavior, as with Aesop. Or Dave Grossman. Or in a few other places, even among the ancients.
When it comes to home, I usually surround myself with creatures who aren't all that problematic in a "nature red in tooth and claw" sense, mostly because I no longer want to deal with any more blood and guts than I absolutely have to. No German Shepherds. No Pit Bulls. No Chows. I do have very large dogs, though.
Very. Large.
Off-putting to strangers, who are terrified by them on first appearance.
That's the idea.
But.
I've told the story often of Xena, the Great Pyrenees, who sat in front of me one day when I was enthroned in the bathroom with what looked like half of a Fu Manchu mustache dangling from one side of her face. Every time it wiggled, she appeared about to sneeze. Eventually, I figured out she'd rescued a mouse from the cats (it was during our severe mouse infestation period), and was holding it--quite alive-in her mouth. I took her outside, and she immediately opened her mouth and released it back into the wild. They are bred to be guard dogs. Gentle towards those they are guarding or who pose them no danger. "Hell follows with [them]", when it comes to the ones who threaten those they are guarding:
wpde.com
Open link
That's their nature.
Letting our pets (dogs, cats, rabbits, etc.) express their instinct and their nature--rather than being our "fur babies," or our "children"--at the same time as we keep them civilized enough to exist in our homes and in our lives, is a generous act and seems to be a vanishing skill. Extending that to the vast animal wilderness, perhaps even more so. I think that's a great shame. Because I don't see how we can learn from them, if we refuse to acknowledge our differences from them.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
When Orca hunt, they have a particular pattern of behaviour. When Orca play, they have a different pattern of behaviour.
If the Orca behaviour towards boats off the coast of Portugal is more consistent with Orca play behaviour than with Orca hunting behaviour, then it seems to me that it's reasonable to infer that their behaviour towards boats is more likely play behaviour than hunting behaviour.
The headline for the linked article is silly, and the article is written in that irritating journalistic style that attributes far too much certainty to the conclusions than is warranted, but I see no reason why the scientists' conclusions themselves are automatically invalid.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Ascribing intent is the problem.
If a kid having fun drops a cement block off an overpass into a car, killing people, it is wrong. Even if the kid was just playing.
These Orcas are sinking boats. Does it matter whether it is all really just in the spirit of good fun?
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You're seeing five of 15 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.