3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson Show3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. No One to Sue
September 5, 2026 at 2:15 PM

No One to Sue

GrandpaPublius
@GrandpaPublius

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark18likesJoin to like10comments

Last week the Trump administration did something I hope will be remembered years from now as a good thing. It repealed a regulation that required large employers to send periodic reports to the Federal government on the race of each employee.

The regulation began in the 1960s as one of the first acts of the newly created Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The EEOC was given the job of prosecuting employers who discriminated based on racial and ethnic origin (later, sex and sexual orientation were added). Every break room in every business in America had a notice pinned on a bulletin board telling employees that if they thought they were being discriminated against, they should contact the EEOC. The commission had lawyers and investigators standing by, waiting to investigate and prosecute wrongdoers.

The EEOC, and those notices, still exist. The action stated above did not affect the EEOC’s mandate to detect, investigate and address specific acts of discrimination. What Trump ended was the collection of data that could be used to support allegations of discrimination in situations where no one was complaining.

The important term here is “disparate impact.” This is where you see a difference in results when you compare racial groups. To those on the left, a disproportionately high share of jobs going to white men is proof that black men are discriminated against.

If you are a progressive in 2009, such disparate impacts are proof of “systemic racism.” Progressives, naturally, condemn this. In 2009, progressives controlled both the presidency and Congress. Did they pass any new laws to combat systemic racism? No, they did not. Progressives controlled the EEOC in 2009. The EEOC created a special Systemic Racism Task Force. Did that task force prosecute anyone? No, it did not. In 2009, there existed (and still exists) a small army of plaintiff’s lawyers eager to win large attorneys’ fee awards for successful lawsuits against racial discrimination. Did any of these lawyers sue anyone over systemic racism? No, they did not.

Systemic racism, you see, is everywhere in America—to our great shame, we have failed to eliminate it. It is everywhere, but no law can be written to end it, and there is no one to sue to combat it. Systemic racism will plague America until the day everyone in America has the exact same amount of money. Only the purest form of socialism can end systemic racism.

The expense of collecting these racial statistics is not trivial. Furthermore, the accuracy has been steadily declining due to the rise of many employees refusing to claim membership in any racial group. These refusals are partly based on principle, and partly based on the fact that the individual is, in fact, a member of multiple racial or ethnic groups.

The Trump Department of Justice believes disparate impacts, at best, might provide a reason to look into a situation to see if any tangible acts of discrimination can be found. At worst, disparate impacts inquiries are an annoying distraction that merely give demagogues something to shout about. The goal is a color blind society. This is a step towards that goal.

G-Pub

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (10)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·5w

    Good riddance!

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Tex929rr@Tex929rr·5w
    Mrs Tex got hired by FedEx as a pilot after leaving the Air Force in 1987- it was her dream job. A couple of years later some EEOC employee cold called her to ask if she encountered any discrimination at FedEx. She was quite righteously angry at being asked and told him so. The president at the time was George HW Bush.
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    TBA@RobtGilsdorf·5w

    Finally, more proof of Trump's racism...as if the voices in my head weren't proof enough.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Stad@Stad·5w

    Good riddance to bad rubbage! Where was the EEOC when the player numbers from the NBA indicated disparate impact? I guess the "principle" of disparate impact only went one way . . .

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Old Bathos@OldBathos·5w

    The reg was kinda like an ongoing discovery demand as if every employer were just a potential defendant. Now, a claim of discrimination needs to use old-fashioned evidentiary measures like actual merit/skills/resume of the plaintiff versus those of the people actually hired.

Scroll for later comments
+5 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of ten comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •