3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Consistently Inconsistent
May 2, 2026 at 5:18 PM

Consistently Inconsistent

GrandpaPublius
@GrandpaPublius

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark20likesJoin to like11comments

First, it was too early. Now, it is too late.

At the start of the most recent hostilities, Democrats universally proclaimed that Trump had started a premature, unnecessary war. There was no imminent threat, they cried. Yes, preventing Iran from getting a nuke was a worthy goal, but Iran was years away from accomplishing that feat. The Democrats were silent on the subject of Iran’s accelerated missile and drone construction program. The Democrats were silent about Iran’s ability to acquire sufficient non-nuclear weapons to deter others from interfering with its nuclear program. The Democrats were silent about Iran acquiring sufficient weapons to enable it to make credible threats to block the Strait of Hormuz.

60 days later, the Democrats call for an end to all hostilities because the last 60 days have established that Trump’s attack was too late. Iran already has sufficient offensive missiles and drones stored in underground bunkers to do grievous harm to the oil-producing capacity of neighboring countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Furthermore, Iran has demonstrated that it already has the ability to close the Strait of Hormuz and hold the world’s economy hostage.

Now Democrats are silent about the consequences of conceding that it is too late. Such a concession is an acknowledgment that no one can, or should, prevent Iran from successfully producing nuclear weapons.

For those looking for consistency, here it is: the Democrats were wrong when they said it was too early, and they are wrong when they say it is now too late. If you wish to be less charitable but equally accurate, you could say the Democrats have consistently been on the side of Iran and consistently opposed to America.

They are also consistently unable to acknowledge their inconsistencies.

G-Pub

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (11)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Subcomandante America@TheReticulator·23w
    GrandpaPublius (View Post):

    For those looking for consistency, it is this: the Democrats were wrong when they said it was too early, and they are wrong when they say it is now too late. If you wish to be less charitable, but equally accurate, you could say the Democrats have consistently been on the side of Iran and consistently opposed to America.

    Yes, if Democrats said it was too early they were wrong. And if Democrats say it is now too late they are wrong. I haven't heard any of that myself, but it wouldn't surprise me. I've heard them say other things about the war that are wrong. But it wouldn't necessarily be inconsistent to say both of the things you mention.

    I would say the war was too early in that there was inadequate planning to deal with the Strait on Day 1. There should have been sufficient naval forces in the vicinity on Day 1 to do what they're doing now, and allies should have been lined up in advance. Nothing about that would have had to jeopardize any element of surprise, as other than the exact timing of the first strike there wasn't anything for anyone to be surprised about. There were people asking on Day 1 about the naval forces needed for a blockade. If rando pundits were saying that, so were military planners deep in the Pentagon who were being ignored . On March 13 when Hegseth said, "Don't worry about it," and Caine said they would be looking at options, they were essentially admitting that they got caught with their pants down. And if we simply didn't have the naval forces to do it right, we probably shouldn't have done it at all.

    And it's far too late to finish the war now without big disruptions to the world economy and ours. But I don't think it's too late to turn it into a win. For it to happen Trump needs to stay the course, and despite his short attention span he may actually do that. I haven't given up on him. But he also needs to decide that he loves America and that he wants a win for America more than he hates Ukraine. Without that he isn't going to squeeze Iran as hard as it needs to be done.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    MikeMcCarthy@MikeMcCarthy·23w

    The time do what is right, or what is necessary, is always now

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Andrew Troutman@Dotorimuk·23w

    It always concerns me when a war stops being front page news.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Eustace C. Scrubb@EustaceCScrubb·23w
    ReplyingtoAndrew Troutman

    Andrew Troutman (View Comment):

    It always concerns me when a war stops being front page news.

    Though it may mean the war is going well and that isn't helpful for the Democrat's media.

  • MODERATOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    E. Kent Golding@EKentGolding·23w
    ReplyingtoSubcomandante America

    Subcomandante America (View Comment):

    But I don’t think it’s too late to turn it into a win. For it to happen Trump needs to stay the course, and despite his short attention span he may actually do that. I haven’t given up on him. But he also needs to decide that he loves America and that he wants a win for America more than he hates Ukraine. Without that he isn’t going to squeeze Iran as hard as it needs to be done.

    Exactly on both counts.

Scroll for later comments
+6 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of eleven comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •