Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Erick Erickson Show
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Daily Signal
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
The evidence that Oswald acted alone remains almost entirely unchallenged. But the behavior of others on the periphery and the manner in which our government acted to control information gave rise to countless conspiracy theories. All of the redactions, bogus secrecy, etc., are reducible to three categories of official reaction to the facts and records: (“They” refers to whatever government entity was involved.)
Hence redactions and overclassifications. The same great minds that designed the Bay of Pigs invasion were apparently reaching out to mobsters who wanted to recover their Cuban holdings, plotting the assassination of Castro, making extensive and possibly unlawful use of diplomatic cover, and not efficiently sharing nor acting upon intel involving Oswald.
John Donovan, my high school teacher and later my mentor during my stint as a teacher, had been a Marine lieutenant and Oswald’s commanding officer in Okinawa. He recalled bull sessions in the radar facility in which Oswald exhibited the traits of a self-educated man—bright, opinionated but not fully aware of the incompleteness of his take on many things. (He had no doubt that Oswald or virtually any other Marine of that era could have accurately made those shots from the Book Depository window.)
John was interviewed by Edward Jay Epstein, who then hired him to help find and interview about a dozen individuals. A rather high percentage of those who agreed to meet had fatal heart attacks, along with one fatal hunting accident, prior to the appointed time. Two others ducked further contact. Coincidence was not impossible. Nor did he conclude that this proved an assassination conspiracy. His take was that if any of these unlikely events were orchestrated, it probably meant that the investigation was wandering into a murky world in which there is a great deal to hide apart from any relevance to the JFK killing. (See, 1,2, and 3 above).
It was thought that Napoleon had stirred up more trouble than necessary with the execution of the Duke of Enghien. This inspired the famous quote: It was worse than a crime; it was a blunder that reflects the eternal attitude of apparatchiks and Deep State denizens in all times and places. Morality, national interest, truth and legality matter far less than avoiding adverse perceptions, political accountability and outright embarrassment no matter how many complications and misperceptions ensue.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (12)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I’ve been privileged to have been found trustworthy enough to be allowed access to classified information. I’m persuaded that 50% of classified information received that status because someone found it to be embarrassing and that person had access to the appropriate rubber stamp.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Never attribute to conspiracy anything which can be explained by incompetence.
Good post.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That aphorism is itself a CIA psyop!
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Robert Heinlein was CIA?
Okay. Maybe.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You're seeing five of twelve comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.