3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. How to Interpret the JFK Files
April 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM

How to Interpret the JFK Files

Old Bathos
@OldBathos

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark24likesJoin to like12comments

The evidence that Oswald acted alone remains almost entirely unchallenged. But the behavior of others on the periphery and the manner in which our government acted to control information gave rise to countless conspiracy theories. All of the redactions, bogus secrecy, etc., are reducible to three categories of official reaction to the facts and records: (“They” refers to whatever government entity was involved.)

  1. They did not make good use of what they knew.
  2. They missed stuff they should have known.
  3. They were doing other things that they should not have been doing.

Hence redactions and overclassifications. The same great minds that designed the Bay of Pigs invasion were apparently reaching out to mobsters who wanted to recover their Cuban holdings, plotting the assassination of Castro, making extensive and possibly unlawful use of diplomatic cover, and not efficiently sharing nor acting upon intel involving Oswald.

John Donovan, my high school teacher and later my mentor during my stint as a teacher, had been a Marine lieutenant and Oswald’s commanding officer in Okinawa. He recalled bull sessions in the radar facility in which Oswald exhibited the traits of a self-educated man—bright, opinionated but not fully aware of the incompleteness of his take on many things. (He had no doubt that Oswald or virtually any other Marine of that era could have accurately made those shots from the Book Depository window.)

John was interviewed by Edward Jay Epstein, who then hired him to help find and interview about a dozen individuals. A rather high percentage of those who agreed to meet had fatal heart attacks, along with one fatal hunting accident, prior to the appointed time. Two others ducked further contact. Coincidence was not impossible. Nor did he conclude that this proved an assassination conspiracy. His take was that if any of these unlikely events were orchestrated, it probably meant that the investigation was wandering into a murky world in which there is a great deal to hide apart from any relevance to the JFK killing. (See, 1,2, and 3 above).

It was thought that Napoleon had stirred up more trouble than necessary with the execution of the Duke of Enghien. This inspired the famous quote: It was worse than a crime; it was a blunder that reflects the eternal attitude of apparatchiks and Deep State denizens in all times and places. Morality, national interest, truth and legality matter far less than avoiding adverse perceptions, political accountability and outright embarrassment no matter how many complications and misperceptions ensue.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (12)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·1y

    I’ve been privileged to have been found trustworthy enough to be allowed access to classified information. I’m persuaded that 50% of classified information received that status because someone found it to be embarrassing and that person had access to the appropriate rubber stamp.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Orange Gerald@Jose·1y
    Old Bathos (View Post):
    • They did not make good use of what they knew.
    • They missed stuff they should have known.
    • They were doing other things that they should not have been doing.

    Never attribute to conspiracy anything which can be explained by incompetence.

    Good post.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Misthiocracy has never@Misthiocracy·1y
    ReplyingtoOrange Gerald

    Orange Gerald (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Post):
    • They did not make good use of what they knew.
    • They missed stuff they should have known.
    • They were doing other things that they should not have been doing.

    Never attribute to conspiracy anything which can be explained by incompetence.

    That aphorism is itself a CIA psyop!

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·1y
    ReplyingtoMisthiocracy has never

    Orange Gerald (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Post):
    • They did not make good use of what they knew.
    • They missed stuff they should have known.
    • They were doing other things that they should not have been doing.

    Never attribute to conspiracy anything which can be explained by incompetence.

    Misthiocracy has never (View Comment):

    That aphorism is itself a CIA psyop!

    Robert Heinlein was CIA?

    Okay. Maybe.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·1y
    ReplyingtoPercival
    Grrr....
Scroll for later comments
+7 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of twelve comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •