Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
I react with contempt to the article "What ‘Created Equal’ Means in America" by William A. Galston in the Wall Street Journal today.
This is an attack on Republicans for objecting to unselective mass immigration in recent years, portraying any objections as a violation of the foundational American principle that "all men are created equal."
The article pretends its sneering condescension is reasonable and true. For a paragraph. Then the "mistakes on both sides" come in. Liberals care too much, it would seem. For the other side:
On the right, there are those who reject these words as self-evidently false. Women should be subordinate to men; people whose families have been in the U.S. for generations are superior to recent immigrants; Christians of European heritage are the real Americans.
The first straw man appears to be the usual misinterpretation of Biblical advice on the nuclear family[1][2][3].
The second straw man is true insofar as lifelong citizens are the core of every civilization.
The third straw man happens to be true at present, and is likely to continue.
These straw men are presented as invalid thoughts on their face, proving once again that liberals do not understand conservatives. No contrast is acknowledged between group and individual arguments.
In response to this article, I'll repurpose my Madame Secretary Rant from some years ago:
Diversity is not a strength of America. Diversity is not a weakness of America. Diversity is irrelevant in America, and that is the whole point. Diversity is a symptom and by-product of the principle that anyone who comes to America and lives by our principles becomes an American. We literally do not care where you came from, what station you were born to, or what you look like.
Toward the end, the article undercuts its own intent by the fundamental error of the liberal conception of immigration:
By the same token, people who work hard, follow the rules, and do their best to sustain their families and communities deserve decent and dignified lives, even if the unfettered market doesn’t provide them.
I am the son of a legal immigrant. It makes all the difference in the world.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (16)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Nice job, mildlyo!
Especially the quote about diversity.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I dropped the WSJ, so I can't read it. But I made it to Mr. Galston's bio:
'Nuff said.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
817 words that no one will ever read. Why do I let it bother me?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
It gets pretty wide dissemination and is an example of how far the WSJ has fallen. I think that's generally attributed to Murdock handing over control to one of his sons.
You're seeing five of 16 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.