The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureHeritage ExplainsChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe American IdeaFederalist Radio HourThe Erick Erickson ShowThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourDaily SignalHillsdale DialoguesMadison’s NotesMom WarsWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusFirst Things PodcastThe Glenn ShowThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  1. Main Feed/
  2. California - Where $$ Goes To Die (126 Billion for High Speed Rail)
April 10, 2026 at 9:54 AM

California - Where $$ Goes To Die (126 Billion for High Speed Rail)

CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
@CarolJoy

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark18likesJoin to like40comments

So someone sat down with a calculator and came up with an interesting fact regarding the 126 billion taxpayer dollars that is now considered to be the expected price for the high-speed rail line connecting LA, San Francisco and Sacramento.

Already some 20 billion dollars have been sunk into buying up properties for a rail line that doesn't yet exist.

As grateful as I am for this man's thinking, I think 126 billion might be only one tenth of the final cost. (Unless Steve Hilton, R, running for governor, manages to defeat the Big Election Cheating we usually experience.)

Off of today's Twitter timeline:











Hans Mahncke @HansMahncke



View post on X

If you gave away $126 billion to subsidize free flights between LA and San Francisco at current demand levels, you could fund roughly 150 to 200 years of travel before the money runs out.

Revealing news clip from KTLA explaining concerns about how much the rail line could cost.

Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (40)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Old Bathos@OldBathos·30w

    For that much money we could provide free housing and healthcare for 20 million illegal aliens.

  • T

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    TBA@RobtGilsdorf·30w
    ReplyingtoOld Bathos

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    For that much money we could provide free housing and healthcare for 20 million illegal aliens.

    Let's not though.

  • CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Gary McVey@GaryMcVey·30w

    I like trains. I'm in favor of mass transit. I've never liked this train, because it makes no economic sense. Many of the arguments for it were superficial--"It would finally tie the state together". There's been rail between SF and LA for about 140 years, and passenger traffic largely abandoned it ages ago. Flights are not expensive.

    There are two parallel major highways along the route, Interstate 5 and highway 101. Political ads, and news stories (same thing, unfortunately) always show images of ten lanes of traffic jams as if this is a problem that HSR will solve. But those video clips aren't of the 5 or 101; they're pictures of the morning traffic along the east-west 10, near downtown Los Angeles. In other words, they lie.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DonG (Here.We.Go.)@DonG·29w
    ReplyingtoTBA

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    For that much money we could provide free housing and healthcare for 20 million illegal aliens.

    TBA (View Comment):

    Let’s not though.

    but you already are. actually it is more.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill@CarolJoy·29w
    ReplyingtoDonG (Here.We.Go.)

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    For that much money we could provide free housing and healthcare for 20 million illegal aliens.

    TBA (View Comment):

    Let’s not though.

    DonG (Here.We.Go.) (View Comment):

    but you already are. actually it is more.

    Yep!

    You read my mind as you replied.

+35 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 40 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •