Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
Federalist Radio Hour
The Erick Erickson Show
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Daily Signal
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
So someone sat down with a calculator and came up with an interesting fact regarding the 126 billion taxpayer dollars that is now considered to be the expected price for the high-speed rail line connecting LA, San Francisco and Sacramento.
Already some 20 billion dollars have been sunk into buying up properties for a rail line that doesn't yet exist.
As grateful as I am for this man's thinking, I think 126 billion might be only one tenth of the final cost. (Unless Steve Hilton, R, running for governor, manages to defeat the Big Election Cheating we usually experience.)
Off of today's Twitter timeline:
Hans Mahncke @HansMahncke
If you gave away $126 billion to subsidize free flights between LA and San Francisco at current demand levels, you could fund roughly 150 to 200 years of travel before the money runs out.
Revealing news clip from KTLA explaining concerns about how much the rail line could cost.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (40)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
For that much money we could provide free housing and healthcare for 20 million illegal aliens.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Let's not though.
CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I like trains. I'm in favor of mass transit. I've never liked this train, because it makes no economic sense. Many of the arguments for it were superficial--"It would finally tie the state together". There's been rail between SF and LA for about 140 years, and passenger traffic largely abandoned it ages ago. Flights are not expensive.
There are two parallel major highways along the route, Interstate 5 and highway 101. Political ads, and news stories (same thing, unfortunately) always show images of ten lanes of traffic jams as if this is a problem that HSR will solve. But those video clips aren't of the 5 or 101; they're pictures of the morning traffic along the east-west 10, near downtown Los Angeles. In other words, they lie.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
but you already are. actually it is more.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yep!
You read my mind as you replied.
You're seeing five of 40 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.