3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Settling the Script Part II
October 3, 2025 at 2:45 PM

Settling the Script Part II

Gary McVey
@GaryMcVey

CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark29likesJoin to like65comments

Last time, we connected Airplane! and the atomic bomb. This time, we’ll take a look at the similarities and differences between two of Paramount’s juiciest off-screen dramas, with a certified USSR Communist in 1930 and a certified SNL cokehead in 1982.

Ivor Montagu’s book With Eisenstein in Hollywood is set in 1929-32. Bob Woodward’s biography of John Belushi, Wired, is set in 1972-82. For all their differences, they have surprising, ironic similarities. Set fifty years apart in time, they’re both stories about writing screenplays and varying reasons why some movie deals fall apart.

Silent director Sergei Eisenstein was permitted to leave the Soviet Union to learn how Hollywood was handling the new world of sound films, which began only two years earlier. Englishman Ivor Montagu, a rich leftist and minor aristocrat, was one of his traveling companions, in effect the business manager for the group of Russians.

To Montagu, America, especially Los Angeles, seemed to be a very church-ridden, puritanical place in 1930. At the close of the silent era, Hollywood was much more easily impressed with foreign dukes and counts than it would be later. They vaguely knew that Eisenstein was regarded as some kind of great director in Europe.

For some time, newcomers have been amazed at how spread out Los Angeles is and how long it takes to go anywhere. For a non-motorist, even a simple day’s itinerary, like “Pitch meeting at Fox, lunch at Warners” was a daunting challenge. Many of the studios were located an hour or more away from each other. Ivor Montagu talked his team into a tenuous production deal at Paramount Pictures based on little more than genteel, old-fashioned formal letters of introduction to Charles Chaplin and Douglas Fairbanks from H.G. Wells and George Bernard Shaw — hard to picture that happening later.

Both scriptwriting teams, Eisenstein’s in 1930 and Belushi’s in 1982, would be led by outsized egos whose successes went to their heads. Neither man was really a writer; they were idea men. Their working methods were similar: long all-night sessions, creating new pages while simultaneously reshaping last night’s, last week’s, and last month’s pages.

Eisenstein and Montagu wrote an adaptation of Theodore Dreiser’s glum An American Tragedy, but Eisenstein, working in a language he barely spoke, was still at heart a silent movie maker, and the results on paper were self-consciously “monumental,” “serious”, and “important.” Paramount pulled the plug. Eisenstein would point the finger at politics and Montagu partly agrees, but the latter admits the studio was simply disappointed with prospects for a dull, expensive film.

About Wired: Any bio of the recently famous, especially if they’re also recently dead, tends to treat their subject as if they’re self-evidently important figures in history. People of 1982 kept telling Bob Woodward what a tragedy it was to lose John Belushi’s towering talent. I’ve laughed at Belushi’s jokes, and I’m not insensitive to his moments of goofy charm, but be real, folks: he is mainly remembered for erupting like a boorish slob in a couple of movies 45+ years ago. We’re talking Bluto, not Plutarch here.

Of course, John’s biggest break was NBC’s Saturday Night (as it was called in 1975). It might not have led to much, the ratings weren’t great. But in the late spring of 1976 the show won Emmys, making it all but cancel-proof for the time being. And best of all for John, his on-air rival, Chevy Chase, quit the show before the second season began.

The other crucial piece of luck that came his way that year: meeting Dan Aykroyd, who’d become his main artistic partner for the remainder of his short life. Belushi was an expressive comic performer with funny ideas, but he couldn’t tell coherent stories. Aykroyd could. So when the two of them came up with their Blues Brothers act, it was Belushi who came up with on-stage somersaults, but it was Aykroyd who turned the gimmick into a saleable feature film script.

Belushi was a character actor in Going South and Old Boyfriends. He was the unlikely, allegedly romantic lead in Continental Divide. He and Aykroyd co-starred in the notably non-funny Neighbors. Other than the TV routines that made him famous, John Belushi’s run as a Hollywood comedy star rests on Animal House, 1941 and The Blues Brothers. Animal House is the only one of his films that made it into profit.

Dan Aykroyd’s straightforward working methods were much more orderly than John’s, which placed creative unpredictability under manic pressure as a high priority. At the time of John Belushi’s death in March 1982, Aykroyd was already working on Ghostbusters and Spies Like Us, both meant to co-star Belushi.

That winter, Belushi made periodic trips to the West Coast to confer with SNL writer Don Novello, “Father Guido Sarducci,” one of the gentlest Catholic jokes on late-night TV.

For decades before the Eighties, when writers were empowered by personal computers to do their own typing and editing, a West Hollywood storefront business called Barbara’s Place had a distinctive in-betweener’s role. Sometimes, the patient ladies of Barbara’s would even be thanked at writers’ awards ceremonies, for tireless, yeoman’s (yeowoman’s?) service. Other support agencies provided stenographers and tape transcriptions for Belushi’s wildly unstructured thought process.

His work methods were surprisingly close to Sergei Eisenstein and Ivor Montagu’s, fifty years earlier: simultaneously dictating scene 5, arguing over ideas for scene 6, making scribbled corrections on scene 4, examining the corrected scene 3, and sending it to the studio while reading and arguing over the studio’s written notes about scenes 1 and 2. All in the same room at the same time, while phones rang, typewriters clacked, and messengers, stenographers, and deliveries of Chinese food rushed everywhere. It was like the famous overcrowded stateroom scene in A Night at the Opera. But the Marx Brothers were funny. The pages that were beginning to reach Michael Eisner, supremo at Paramount, were not. His sense of concern was, shall we say, quickly communicated to Bernie Brillstein, John Belushi’s agent and manager.

Belushi and Novello were rewriting someone else’s script, Sweet Deception, a romcom about jewel thieves and the naïve young heir to a winery. They turned it into a harder, Bluto-style comedy, Noble Rot. The title is a winemaker’s term for the slightest touch of fungus that helps fermentation. In context, it suggests that it takes a small bit of cynical, wised-up “bad” to turn an innocent into a resilient, realistic man. At least, that was the idea.

But all of the patient magic of the typists at Barbara’s Place couldn’t turn Noble Rot into a coherent screenplay, because Novello, a respected writer of brief comedy sketches, was hopelessly outmuscled in the creative process by Belushi, who added incoherent scenes at random, set at the Playboy Mansion, Hollywood parties, and wildly costly stunts in the lobby of the World Trade Center. Why couldn’t Novello counter this the way Aykroyd would have? The answer seems to be that nobody would have backed Novello up — and he knew it.

Bernie Brillstein knew on first reading that the script was flat-out unproduceable, which is really saying something considering the quality of some of the produce-able ones. So he and Eisner made the best deal they could: delay Noble Rot with endless rewrites indefinitely (like, forever) while switching John’s play-or-pay deal to Penny Marshall’s romcom version of The Joy of Sex. Creatively, this was insane ("Belushi," "joy" and "sex" do not really belong in one sentence), but it would have been a shrewd business move had Belushi not suddenly died of an overdose.

This book was controversial in its day, largely because of its remorselessly detailed account of hard drug use, especially cocaine. Critics of Wired, mostly angry friends of Belushi, are left with the tough job of arguing that, yeah, Bob Woodward got his facts right, but the overall picture was wrong. Dozens of celebrities were aghast. They regretted being so open and honest in their interviews with Woodward. Habits that they’d mistakenly seen as common, even routine in the mid-to-late Seventies, were suddenly dreadfully embarrassing in the “Just Say No” days emerging in the Eighties. John Belushi’s shocking death was part of the reason.

In 1982, the year Belushi died, Arthur C. Clarke sent script pages of 2010: The Year We Make Contact to MGM overnight, via his Kaypro computer, from his home in Sri Lanka to director Peter Hyams. A new era in the process of screenwriting had dawned.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (65)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Judge Mental@JudgeMental·1y

    Ackroyd can write and produce a script, but he needs someone who can tell him no along the way. Otherwise, you get Nothing But Trouble.

    Do I smell a Part 3?

  • CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Gary McVey@GaryMcVey·1y
    ReplyingtoJudge Mental

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    Ackroyd can write and produce a script, but he needs someone who can tell him no along the way. Otherwise, you get Nothing But Trouble.

    Do I smell a Part 3?

    Could be. I see deal. Have your people call my people. Or look, save the phone call. I'll be at the Polo Lounge for breakfast at 7:30, Stop by the table. I'll have our legal counsel slide in for a pow-wow.

  • CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Gary McVey@GaryMcVey·1y

    "Former self-styled 'arts administrator' McVey arrested for using the term "pow-wow": Chumash Indians seek injunction"

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·1y
    Gary McVey (View Post):

    This book was controversial in its day, largely because of its remorselessly detailed account of hard drug use, especially cocaine. Critics of Wired, mostly angry friends of Belushi, are left with the tough job of arguing that yeah, Bob Woodward got his facts right, but the overall picture was wrong.

    Bobby Woodward wouldn't know a fact if you intaglioed one on his forehead with a cold steel chisel. Bill Murray had an interesting review of Wired:

    Bobby has been refuted before. Effectively, as far as I can tell:

    Calls Interviews in Book ‘Fabrication’ : Widow Denies Casey, Woodward Talked

    Report: Doctor calls Casey deathbead interview 'impossible'

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    OccupantCDN@OccupantCDN·1y

    Ghostbusters with Belushi? Ghostbusters is one of those comically perfect films, because of its perfection - any alteration would have diminished it or outright ruin it... I can only see Belushi's mania as a distraction from Ghostbusters plots.

    Animal House would have been profitable because of its low budget - Something that Blues Brothers tried to be, until the ending car chase that destroyed dozens of cars... 1941 I loved that film... Ive seen it dozens of times... It does look like a big budget film

    I think we're about to see an explosion in animated films... The $30 Million dollar film "Critterz" is coming soon, and if it does reasonably well, we could be seeing lots of these movies... Disney animated movies recently have been costing over $200 Million!

    Could you imagine how profitable a Jetson's, Batman or Superman animated movie could be? IF they could keep the budget under control?

Scroll for later comments
+60 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 65 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •