The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowNot Dead YetHeritage ExplainsChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe Learning CurveThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourHillsdale DialoguesMom WarsConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusFirst Things PodcastThe Glenn ShowThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  1. Main Feed/
  2. Outrage Doesn’t Change the Outcomes of War
April 4, 2024 at 9:25 AM

Outrage Doesn’t Change the Outcomes of War

Susan Quinn
@SusanQuinn

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark29likesJoin to like46comments

Talk about outrage, I am outraged at the U.S. insistence on labelling the recent bombing that killed humanitarian workers an outrage, not a tragedy, but an outrage. In fact, I am disgusted that the US thinks it needs to condemn Israel for the unintentional killing of humanitarian workers, for other actions that Israel is not even taking (such as slowing humanitarian aid), and for raiding hospitals where Hamas is stationed. The U.S. seems to think that berating Israel will get them to behave themselves or be more careful, as if they were misbehaving children.

In case you haven’t noticed, John Kirby, there’s a war going on.

War is ugly. Bad things happen. Mistakes are committed. But the US has repeatedly spoken out as if Israel is irresponsible, as if Israel is not doing its best to get humanitarian aid to the Palestinians, as if Israel is not trying to avoid killing civilians whenever possible.

There’s a war going on.

Hamas is using its own people as human shields. It is occupying hospitals as military locations. It is holding hostages, most who may be dead. It has no intention of engaging in reasonable negotiations to release those hostages and stop the fighting. And when do you hear the protests of the US against Hamas?

Crickets.

It’s been obvious for a while that the US thinks Israel is not interested in doing anything except wiping out Hamas. The US believes that Israel does not care about civilians dying. Hamas must hope that the Palestinians will starve, because Israel will be blamed and held responsible.

The only reason that the Palestinians are starving is because Hamas will not negotiate a practical peace, and they steal supplies from civilians whenever they can. It wants to keep fighting, even if it means killing the last Palestinian in Gaza.

Where is the outrage for Hamas, President Biden?

Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (46)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • Banned Member@DrewInWisconsin·2y
    Susan Quinn (View Post):

    The only reason that the Palestinians are starving is because Hamas will not negotiate a practical peace, and they steal supplies from civilians whenever they can. It wants to keep fighting, even if it means killing the last Palestinian in Gaza.

    Yep. That's what happens to the aid given to Gaza. Hamas takes it first. It doesn't get to the citizens they think are receiving it. It first goes to the soldiers. This is how it's always been in the history of warfare.

    Susan Quinn (View Post):

    Where is the outrage for Hamas, President Biden?

    Hey, you want him to lose Michigan!?

  • Banned Member@BryanGStephens·2y

    The workers are in a war zone.

    Things happen.

    This is like being outraged Red Cross workers are killed by accident in Germany in WWII.

    It is, at its core, simply being anti Israel.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·2y
    ReplyingtoDrewInWisconsin, Œuf

    DrewInWisconsin, Œuf (View Comment):

    Hey, you want him to lose Michigan!?

    Hope so. Big time.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·2y
    ReplyingtoBryan G. Stephens

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    The workers are in a war zone.

    Things happen.

    This is like being outraged Red Cross workers are killed by accident in Germany in WWII.

    It is, at its core, simply being anti Israel.

    Yes. I kept thinking, is there another word they could have used, and it hit me: tragedy. Which is exactly what it was. Thanks, Bryan.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·2y

    If Slow Joe had wanted peace in the Mideast, he shouldn't have let the Iranians have that $76 billion that they've collected under his watch. Iran funds Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.

    Being president is a hard job. It's harder when you can't make it past 2:00 in the afternoon without all those pharmaceuticals.

+41 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 46 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •