Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
May 24, 1764. Samuel Adams drafted "Instructions to Boston's Representatives" in the Massachusetts General Assembly, declaring that Parliament had no right to tax the colonies.
After a victorious but expensive Seven Years' War (French and Indian War), Britain needed to finance its new standing army in North America and to pay off its huge war debt. The preexisting legislation, the Molasses Act of 1733, imposed high duties on the cheap sugar that colonial rum distillers imported from non-British colonies, but it was easily evaded by colonial merchants and so raised little money. On April 5, 1764, Parliament voted to replace it with the Sugar Act, which cut the duty in half but made it nearly impossible to evade. Moreover, the Sugar Act removed the trials for smuggling sugar from sympathetic local juries to the admiralty courts under control of the Crown. The Sugar Act would have ruined many Boston merchants.
The Boston Town Meeting instructed Samuel Adams to draft instructions to its delegates in the General Assembly on how to respond, which he did on May 24, 1764. Although Adams emphasized "the unshaken loyalty of this province and this town — its unrival’d exertion in supporting his Majesty’s government and rights in this part of his dominions," he declared that Parliament had no right to tax the colonies because they had no representatives there.
The key language was the following:
If Taxes are laid upon us in any shape without our having a legal Representation where they are laid, are we not reduced from the Character of free Subjects to the miserable State of tributary Slaves?
This was the first public document to declare that Parliament lacked legitimate authority over the colonies. With these instructions, Samuel Adams and the Boston Town Meeting lit the spark that would become a conflagration and result in the birth of a new nation in 1776.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (13)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You may read a slightly modernized version of the Instructions here.
CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Another great America 250 post. Thanks, Steve.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Well done, Steve. An important act to remember.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
This is an excellent post, and it ought to be promoted to the Main Feed immediately.
As an active student of the American Colonial era and the American War of Independence, I appreciate the post greatly. It provides further depth and context for Samuel Adams’ greater role in the coming years. Also, it shows that the Patriot arguments in favor of home rule were grounded in the legal foundation of the colonies themselves, and not simply griping about paying taxes.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Such amazing history we have and so much courage back then. Do they even teach this stuff anymore??
You're seeing five of 13 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.