Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
I maintain that our once "Shining City on a Hill" Republic has been turned into a corrupt Oligarchy, and that the main driver of the conversion is public unions. Two quotes are worthy of remembering:
FDR could hardly have been firmer: Meticulous attention should be paid to the special relationships and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the Government … The process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service.
Until the rights revolution in the 1960s, the idea of negotiating against the public interest was unthinkable. AFL-CIO president George Meany in 1955 stated bluntly that it is “impossible to bargain collectively with the Government.”
The Administrative State is staffed by public union employees.
Micromanagement and expansive rights became integral to the public union playbook for control—no innovation is allowed unless the official can show it complies with a rule; no decision about a public employee’s performance is valid without objective proof in a trial‐type hearing. Clearing out the legal underbrush is what’s needed to restore officials’ freedom to use common sense in daily choices.
Why do Americans feel that their votes are essentially useless?
No matter which party is elected, no matter what its priorities, the one certainty is that government operations will not be made more efficient, or responsive, or, as with schools and police accountability, even functional. Public employee unions keep it that way by layers of legal armor and by the exercise of brute political force.
The book does not discuss what I consider to be the immediate crisis. Our "justice" department personnel are union employees. As Chuck Schumer said, “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,”.
This is obvious to anyone but a fully committed Democrat, and it is obvious to many of them, and they LOVE it!
Democrats see public unions as their meal ticket. Republican leaders treat public unions like an unfriendly sovereign power that must be dealt with, even if its demands are unreasonable and cause America harm. Would-be reformers of either party, determined to run government prudently, approach unions hat in hand. Any reforms at the margins come at a high price. With two notable exceptions, every effort to rein in union excesses has resulted in abject political defeat. The unions, meanwhile, continue to tighten their grip over government operations.
The book suggests some measures that might help, but I find them inadequate. I believe the SCOTUS is our only hope.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (19)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
If they don't just duck and cover, again.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Bad link.
Perhaps you meant:
cato.org
Open link
(Not your fault; a very weird Ricochet bug just did that to me, too.)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The article misses the real issue: public sector unions are an effective way to channel federal funds into the Democrat Party.
Check out this table from Open Secrets, Public Sector Unions Top Contributors
Top Public Sector Unions Contributors
The columns are:
| Rank | Contributor | Grand Total | Total to Candidates & Parties | Democrat | Republican | Total to Outside Spending Groups | Liberal Groups | Conservative Groups |
Showing 1 to 20 of 20 entries
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Exactly! The book goes into that, but not at the level of actual numbers you present. Thanks.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I'm totally against public sector unions, but I don't think that's the key to fixing the deep administrative state. The problem is also that Congress delegated too much power to the administrative agencies, without any of the usual checks and balances. And a problem with that is that Congress is in on the racket, by way of what it calls Constituent Services.
If we replaced the Hatch Act provisions that were removed during the Clintons' administration, that might help a little, but it would be only a first step.
You're seeing five of 19 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.