3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Dostoevsky’s Warning About Forced Equality
September 14, 2025 at 3:05 PM

Dostoevsky’s Warning About Forced Equality

Theodoric of Freiberg
@TheodoricofFreiberg

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark31likesJoin to like11comments

A Commentary podcast dealing with Charlie Kirk's horrendous assassination included a reference to Fyodor Dostoevsky's 1873 novel The Demons. I had never read it, so I determined to rectify that oversight. I am so glad that I did. I commend it to all.

Here is my take.

When Dostoevsky wrote Demons in 1872, he seemed to be spinning a wild satire about a group of provincial radicals. In truth, he was peering into the future. What he saw was that the dream of enforcing equality of outcomes—the idea that no one should ever stand out (does that sound familiar?)—can only be achieved by breaking the human spirit.

The radicals in his novel, led by the scheming Pyotr Verkhovensky, want to level society so thoroughly that genius, beauty, and individuality disappear. To get there, they lie, blackmail, and even kill. Their town collapses into chaos, not utopia. Dostoevsky’s message was clear: people cannot be forced into sameness without destroying what makes them human.

History vindicated him. The Bolsheviks promised equality but delivered gulags, starvation and the mass murder of millions. Mao’s Cultural Revolution humiliated teachers and artists in the name of leveling society and produced even more deaths. Pol Pot’s Cambodia tried to erase all distinction, even executing people for wearing glasses—and resulted in the killing of a quarter of the population. Different ideologies, but the same result: the crushing of individuality, freedom, and progress, and the deaths of millions.

Human beings long for freedom, creativity, and meaning. When a system demands absolute equality of outcome, it collides with those desires. To close the gap, coercion steps in: censorship, propaganda, prisons, and terror. The result is not progress but stagnation, disease and death. A society that silences its most creative and courageous people is a society that withers and dies.

Demons still matters because its warning is timeless. A culture that sacrifices freedom and individuality for the illusion of perfect equality gains neither justice nor happiness. It only breeds resentment, despair, and decay. Dostoevsky reminds us that true human flourishing comes not from leveling people down, but from allowing them to rise, each in their own way.

I'm reminded of Robert Frost, Poet Laureate under John F. Kennedy, saying, “The best things and best people rise out of their separateness; I’m against a homogenized society because I want the cream to rise.” Would that his philosophy were still with us today.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (11)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • CONTRIBUTOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Brickhouse Hank@HankRhody·1y

    That... that's a lot of book to read in a few days. I mean, I can burn through pages from time to time, but not on Dostoevsky.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Henry Castaigne@HenryCastaigne·1y

    I couldn't get through the book but I did listen to the analysis.

    youtube.com

    Open link

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Stad@Stad·1y
    Theodoric of Freiberg (View Post):
    The Bolsheviks promised equality but delivered gulags, starvation and the mass murder of millions. Mao’s Cultural Revolution humiliated teachers and artists in the name of leveling society and produced even more deaths. Pol Pot’s Cambodia tried to erase all distinction, even executing people for wearing glasses—and resulted in the killing of a quarter of the population. Different ideologies, but the same result: the crushing of individuality, freedom, and progress, and the deaths of millions.

    I wouldn't say they had different ideologies. I prefer to think of them as the same authoritarian ideology with different packaging . . .

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Miffed White Male@MiffedWhiteMale·1y
    Theodoric of Freiberg (View Post):

    The radicals in his novel, led by the scheming Pyotr Verkhovensky, want to level society so thoroughly that genius, beauty, and individuality disappear.

    Brickhouse Hank (View Comment): ’s a lot of book to read in a few days. I mean, I can burn through pages from time to time, but not on Dostoevsky.

    Would this be the short-story version of that?

    en.wikipedia.org

    Open link

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Drew didn't ban himself@OldDanRhody·1y
    Theodoric of Freiberg (View Post):
    Human beings long for freedom, creativity, and meaning.

    Not all. Too many fear the responsibility those things bring with them.

Scroll for later comments
+6 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of eleven comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •