Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
"They're taking my Social Security away," she said, standing next to me in the grocery store aisle.
"Who's taking your Social Security away??" I asked with genuine concern (and a little bit of shock) in my voice and face.
"The government," she scowled. "Pretty soon, I won't be able to afford anything."
This exchange happened at our local Whole Foods store, where my wife and I were shopping for some rarer staples she needed for a new dietary regimen her doctor had prescribed for a besetting illness, things we couldn't get at our usual Kroger.
A fellow shopper, a petite, elderly, smartly dressed and coiffed lady, had been next to me, reaching up to the top shelves for a product clearly at the limit of her fingertips. Noticing her stretch, I kindly offered to grab it for her, but she quickly rebuffed me.
"I can get it for myself," she said.
"OK," I replied as pleasantly as I could, turning my head more out of courtesy than necessity to the products on the lower shelves. I didn't want to embarrass her awkward body language.
On her toes, she snagged the box she wanted with her fingertips, brought it down, and scrutinized the price tag. "These prices are going up every day! I don't know how they think we can afford it."
Drawn back into the conversation, I agreed, "I hear ya. Prices are bouncing around a lot lately."
"Not just that," she added, "between this and losing my Social Security, it scares the heck out of me."
I raised my eyebrows. She was entering my domain. Retired now, in a matter of months I'm due to begin collecting my own benefit. "What??" I asked, "What's happening with your Social Security?"
"They're taking my Social Security away," she said.
"Who's taking your Social Security away?"
"The government. Pretty soon I won't be able to afford anything."
"The government?!" I asked. "Who?"
"You know," she said scornfully.
"I don't," I replied, "I'm supposed to start my own Social Security pretty soon."
"Well, good luck with that," she said, tossing her box into her cart, turning, and walking away.
Now I don't want to sound like I'm stereotyping, but this lady didn't strike me as one of the targeted populations under the eye of DOGE who might be illegally receiving Social Security benefits. What she seemed like was someone who is clearly independent, maybe a little jaded, but genuinely in fear of losing a core benefit to which she is probably completely entitled. I felt sorry for her fearfulness. Not that I'm entirely convinced that the Social Security infrastructure can support current-level benefits for a limitless future. That's another thing altogether. But that her fear was undoubtedly kindled and is being stoked daily by political rhetoric that, as best as I can tell, is unjustified by the actions of "the government".
Given many public statements by Democrat lawmakers (which are painfully amplified by the mainstream media) and Joe Biden's very recent speech in Chicago, containing unfounded language seeking to strike a measure of abject fear in the hearts of those concerned with our retired population, I am ready to call this what it is.
Unless I have misinterpreted plain speech, Elon Musk and DOGE have publicly stated that their objective is to do what they can to preserve Social Security benefits for bona fide recipients by eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse in the system. To take that message, and the actual work being done to that end, and falsely accuse "the government" of trying to take citizens' legitimate Social Security benefits away is a lie with only one objective: Striking terror in the hearts of a massive segment of our population.
So, is that it? Is this an actual form of "terrorism"? For my money, I don't know what word describes it better. Feel free to comment and enlighten me. It is certainly not right. It is not true. It is unjustified and shameful. But, maybe that's the degenerated state of our politics today. As a retirement-aged guy who, believe me, has seen plenty of nefarious political tactics over the decades, this is one of the most victimizing. And I think that's terrorable.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (56)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The Democrat messaging, that includes much of the mainstream print and tele-media and even publicly funded media along with almost all of academia are your sources, and those sources propagate ideas unsupported by factual information. This is why the work of Elon Musk in providing a social media platform supporting free speech is so vital and that is illustrated by the immediate effects it had in the 2024 elections. Free speech, the concept, is distorted by Democrats, media, and academia.
I, and my wife, are long time beneficiaries of SS benefits and the only thing I worry about is the point I extracted for this comment and I think that is the main point of the DOGE effort. The Democrats are doing their usual and trying to make any effort of political opposition look detrimental to the public by lying about it in public pronouncements. I find nothing to praise in those Democrat Party positions.
MODERATOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The Democrats have been claiming that the Republicans have been wanting to end Social Security for as long as I have been alive. Whether or not the claim is true, it has always been effective in scaring old people. Social Security has always been set up as a Ponzi scam. The demographics of SS are getting more and more adverse.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I forgot which specific campaign year it was, but the Demo-rats are the ones who came up with the image of the VP candidate pushing an elderly woman in a wheelchair off a cliff. Nothing new here.
MODERATOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
When I was under 40, the Democrats screaming that Republicans were going to end social security really, really got my hopes up. I kept dreaming of keeping my FICA tax money, investing it in the market , and getting really really good returns on my money. Now I have paid FICA for 40 years, and my money is gone.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
dailymail.co.uk
Open link
You're seeing five of 56 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.