3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. N.Y. Appellate Court: C-
August 22, 2025 at 9:54 AM

N.Y. Appellate Court: C-

GrandpaPublius
@GrandpaPublius

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark23likesJoin to like36comments

Well, the New York appellate courts had their first opportunity to squash anti-Trump lawfare like a bug and … they get a C-. They did the minimum required to avoid a firestorm. They threw out the absurdly large fine — half a BILLION bucks — but after that, they floundered.

Two justices, in a sad, sad performance, voted to affirm everything but the fine. Two other justices acknowledged the obvious — that Judge Engoron screwed up badly in everything he did, but they couldn’t pull the trigger on killing the case, so they took the coward’s way out and voted for a new trial.

Only one justice, David Friedman, called a bag of garbage a bag of garbage and voted to kill the case in its entirety. In 122 pages, Justice Friedman explained (1) why the New York statute in question doesn’t apply, (2) that New York Attorney General Letitia James abused her authority by bringing this case for political reasons, (3) that factually, Trump did nothing wrong, (4) that the banks and insurance companies Trump dealt with told Engoron that Trump did nothing wrong, and he ignored them, (5) that outside experts in New York accounting, banking and insurance practices told Engoron that Trump did nothing wrong, and he ignored them too, (6) James’ and Engoron’s position regarding the valuation of Mar-a-lago was hilariously wrong, and (7) that the humongous fine Engoron imposed made no sense legally, logically, or factually.

I learned one tidbit I had not heard before. Allegedly, Trump inflated his net worth to banks and insurance companies to get lower interest rates or lower insurance premiums. Trump told them he was worth over $4 billion. Letitia James asserted that Trump was only worth two billion. Guess what the threshold was before a customer could get the lower interest rate or premiums? It varied by bank or insurance company, but the highest, get it, the highest, was 100 million (with an “m”).

With a 2-2-1 split opinion, there is no actual decision on anything other than throwing out the half-billion-dollar fine. The case will proceed up the appellate ladder to a higher court for a final decision. Although that “final” decision may not be final at all. It might be an order for a new trial. A trial that could not take place until Trump is out of office.

All in all, those cynics saying New York appellate judges are as politically corrupt as New York trial judges appear, so far, to be mostly right. Maybe the appellate panel reviewing Alvin Bragg’s criminal bag of garbage will do better.

G-Pub

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (36)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·1y

    Too bad it's group work. I'd give the one judge an A+ and fail the rest.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·1y

    Hopefully the next level will pay attention to the Friedman report.

  • CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Gary McVey@GaryMcVey·1y

    OK, let's take the (relative) win, pocket it, and go back for more.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·1y
    ReplyingtoGary McVey

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    OK, let’s take the (relative) win, pocket it, and go back for more.

    That seems to be what they're doing. Other progress is unlikely to come until they have a better governor selecting judges.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Chicks dig me! @Yarob@Yarob·1y
    GrandpaPublius (View Post):
    They threw out the absurdly large fine — half a BILLION bucks — but after that, they floundered

    The fine wasn't half a billion dollars, it was $355 million but grew with interest after the broke OI didn't pay it and appealed.

Scroll for later comments
+31 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 36 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •