3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. We Saw How Price Controls Worked in the 1970s. Did We Learn Anything?
August 29, 2024 at 9:47 AM

We Saw How Price Controls Worked in the 1970s. Did We Learn Anything?

Bob Thompson
@BobThompson

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark15likesJoin to like43comments

Since Kamala Harris assumed the role of Democrat presidential nominee, she has presented few specific policy proposals for voters to use in making their ballot decisions. As I was writing some posts over the weekend, detailing my work experiences with the changes that took place in that timeframe, including automation eliminating most paper check transactions, I remembered some other events of that period.

The Vietnam conflict had been a major issue for Americans as the decade of the sixties concluded, but it was in the seventies when we got some real learning experiences in macroeconomics and government monetary policy interventions. The American economy went into what was termed an economic recession in 1970. That was a new experience for many Americans, and it was a big part of what prompted me to leave the small data processing service bureau where I had been employed for three years after leaving a position in commercial bank operations systems development.

I remember the first half of the decade as being dominated by political issues: President Nixon's dealings with China, the election campaign against Democrat George McGovern, Vice-President Agnew's expulsion from office for uncovered misbehavior, and Gerald Ford replacing him; Watergate and Nixon's resignation, Ford becoming president, and wrapping up with the end of the American involvement in the Vietnam conflict. Wow! That seems like a really busy half-decade — and I left out several significant events. But we were just getting started.

After Nixon left office, the 1976 presidential campaign started. I recall that Ronald Reagan, former Hollywood actor and governor of California challenged President Ford but the incumbent got the nomination and was pitted against a former Democrat governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter. Guess what the Republican election campaign slogan was: "WIN," or "Whip Inflation Now." It didn't work. Carter won the election, but "WIN" said a lot about America's economic dilemma during the first half of the decade.

This was about the time that I started working at the Treasury Department, managing the systems development project to convert federal check payments to electronically delivered Direct Deposit. Both inflation and interest rates rose over time to double digits. The OPEC energy cartel limited market production of crude oil, and this had an immediate effect on the world market price. Retail gasoline prices rose rapidly in America. The Carter Administration placed price controls on retail gasoline at the pump, and this created shortages in supply immediately. This created a new problem for the people in our society.

The gap created distanced demand from the supply of retail gasoline, causing enormous lines at gasoline stations, which were aggravated by the shortage that left many stations without gasoline to sell. A rule was put in place to limit customers at stations to alternate days depending on whether tags ended in even or odd numbers. This reduced the size of lines, but they were still long and this just added to the frustrations of a people already burdened with inflation and high interest rates. My family and I experienced it all very directly.

And it eventually arrived as an issue in my job responsibility. The professional economists in the Carter Administration and the Treasury Department were of two minds. Those who supported the price controls on retail gasoline, which were already in effect at something like $.75/gallon, considered implementing rationing similar to what had been done during WWII. This would involve my staff in analysis, for planning how to produce and distribute rationing coupons for gasoline. The more free-market economists said the short supply problem would not exist and would go away if the price controls were removed, allowing the price to rise to the world market price — somewhere in the neighborhood of $1.50/gallon. The latter approach was taken and the problem went away. (A miracle.)

So my Operations Planning and Research Staff went back to work on getting rid of checks.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (43)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bob Thompson@BobThompson·2y

    I forgot to note that the United States went off the gold standard backing the dollar in 1970.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·2y
    Bob Thompson (View Post):
    Did We Learn Anything?

    Only those who study history learn from it. Does Kamala seem like a student of history?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    The Reticulator@TheReticulator·2y

    We learned to wait until people forget before trying it again. Usually it takes only a few weeks, but sometimes people are in a hurry.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    EODmom@EODmom·2y
    ReplyingtoThe Reticulator

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    We learned to wait until people forget before trying it again. Usually it takes only a few weeks, but someone people are in a hurry.

    The intent doesn’t change, tho does it?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bob Thompson@BobThompson·2y
    ReplyingtoEODmom

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    We learned to wait until people forget before trying it again. Usually it takes only a few weeks, but someone people are in a hurry.

    EODmom (View Comment):

    The intent doesn’t change, tho does it?

    Distraction plays a big part in keeping the enslaved workers from overthrowing rule by those who think of themselves as the elite.

Scroll for later comments
+38 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 43 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •