Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
I am most enjoying the reactions to visitors to the United States for the World Cup games. But it’s also still fun to mock hateful anti-American leftists.
Many of us have mocked institutions (often “educational”) and individuals who begin meetings, events, and presentations with “land acknowledgments” that call attention to the fact that the event is being held on land stolen from such and such “indigenous” people.
But we mock the land acknowledgments because they never include an offer to return the land to the peoples from whom it was supposedly stolen. I suppose the defenders of land acknowledgments could note that since the occupying institution has held the land for an extended time, returning the land to the peoples from whom the land was “stolen” would be impractical.
OK. But former President Obama doesn’t have that excuse with respect to his recently constructed and just-opened Obama Presidential Center.
As has been widely reported, the formal opening ceremony for the Obama Presidential Center began with the predictable gesture.
Valerie Jarrett, the former senior advisor to Obama when he was president and the current CEO of the Obama Foundation, kicked things off.
"We’d also like to take a moment to recognize the original inhabitants of the land upon which we are gathered today," she said. "We honor the Anishinaabe, the Council of Three Fires, the Ojibwe, the Odawa and the Potawatomi nations."
This took place at a newly constructed building and complex, on land that the Obama people spent many years and much money fighting to build the center upon.
Since the “Obama Presidential Center” is new construction, it didn’t have to be built on that particular plot. In fact, there was no shortage of controversy and litigation involving the use of that land. If the Obama Foundation considers it stolen, why spend so much time, energy, and money fighting and litigating to build there?
So, Mr. Obama, why did you spend nearly a billion dollars building a structure (monument to yourself) on land to which you do not legitimately claim?
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (32)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The Obama Presidential Center covers 19 acres. So did 5 different tribes possess little pieces of that tiny tract simultaneously? Or did one seize it from another? If they seized it from each other, what is wrong with white settlers seizing it from the land Indian tribe to have seized it?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Another question that has been asked of people making "land acknowledgments."
I live in north Texas, which was occupied by a series of tribes (or "peoples") before the first "European" settlers arrived.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I hope it’s haunted.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That it’s stealing under our laws. We believe in the rule of law.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
No problemo! One land acknowledgment wipes away such sins (except for conservatives) . . .
You're seeing five of 32 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.