Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
DeSantis wrote in a Wednesday post on X that "it is absurd that anyone, much less someone running for President, would choose now to attack our friend and ally, Israel, much less praise Hezbollah terrorists as 'very smart.'"
In a recent BDB post (who is on fire of late) crystallized a vague concept I had about the legacy GOP and their over-reliance on political debate as a substitute for achieving results. I mean that quite literally.
It doesn’t really matter what we do, it only matters what we say out loud, lest someone get the wrong ideas in their pretty little heads.
I have often read on these very pages on Ricochet and elsewhere, how Trump should be more careful about how he says things because the media and Democrats will pounce on the wrong interpretation.
This in itself is laughable because these people are entirely capable of making any statement into any absurd meaning they wish.
Further, the fear GOP candidates have of being misconstrued (usually with deliberate intent) turns their statements into mild pablum, full of platitudes and devoid of strength and impact.
This is why Romney lost, and why so many GOPers fail.
Then, these very same pols who have failed to gain higher office, or failed to keep their weasel-ly promises while serving in office, gleefully join the attacks on DJT for being insufficiently vague and nuanced in his speech.
The statement from Ron DeSantis is despicable and clearly desperate. But desperation should not mitigate the reprehensible conclusion that Trump is “attack(ing) Israel” by saying these words.
Apparently Trumps actions are to be completely ignored, and his latest ‘words’, badly misinterpreted, should define his entire being.
(This, by the way, dismisses the amazing accomplishments Trump made on behalf of Israel to include the bold action to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem, the Abraham accords, and granting his Jewish son-in-law close advisory position and more)
As to the substance, or lack thereof, to the charge that referring to someone being “smart” is ‘praise’ well, I fail to see that logic, and it scares me if DeSantis actually believes we should never regard our mortal enemies as being smart, cunning or resilient. He wants to be Commander-in Chief?
On the second level, does DeSantis believe this absurd attack will help his chances?
That’s not very smart, Ron.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (284)
Hey, last week Joe Biden gave Hamas advice for how to kill more Israelis.
It is absurd that anyone, much less someone running for President, would say such a thing.
Trump's comments are not any different from the observations many have made about how this was a well-planned, well-coordinated attack. (The implication of which is that not only did intelligence agencies fail, but that the planning and coordination almost surely came from somewhere outside Gaza.)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I thank you. I believe quite strongly that once the “right” sacrificed language to euphemism and superficially polite, the “right” willingly gave up the field. Language has meaning but past behaviour is a very good indicator of future behaviour. Accommodating on language hoping to appease has been a really stupid strategy. I also believe that people behave most tellingly at the extremes of their situation or circumstances: Grace under fire and all that.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Lest we forget, Trump moved the US embassy to Jerusalem when everyone in high places seemed to be saying this was impossible or that it would take years to accomplish. Trump is not an enemy of Israel. His language is not always precise (Crafty or cunning might be better words to describe Hamas.), but they are quite understandable to any honest English-speaking person.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I could see voting for desantis, despite the weird things he has had to say about Ukraine. I'm more interested in deeds than words.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Absolutely shocking that de Santis would say something negative about Trump, when Trump has done nothing but shower de Santis with lavish praise.
You're seeing five of 284 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.