Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Federalist Radio Hour
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Glenn Show
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Teaching the biblical basis for government, I have had students read The American Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man. I asked students to notice similarities and differences between the documents. Students discovered the French document premised its authority on “the people.” The American document based its authority on “Nature’s God,” “The Creator,” “The Supreme Judge of the world,” and “Divine Providence.”
The French document concedes a “Supreme Being” but one who is only “present.” The French declaration says government “recognizes and declares the rights of citizens.” Notice it is the government which gives rights. Students were surprised at the human-centered French document. Statement #6 in that declaration always stood out: “Law is the expression of the general will.” They would often ask, “If people are the sole authority— that is, the “law”—how do we know which people should have authority?” More discussion brought out the basic belief: the French declaration assumed humans are basically good and have the authority to grant rights. “But what happens when people disagree?” students would ask. “Who grants “rights” then? And if I’m in authority, don’t I get to decide who gets rights and whose rights get taken away?” Students were asking some great questions.
But the room always fell silent when I told them that 30,000 people were killed during the French Revolution—people’s right to life had literally been taken away. Those murdered were considered “enemies of the state.” In the end, I made this summary to the class: If rights are given by government, government can take away rights. If rights are given by God, government’s role is to protect those rights.* For those who have ears to hear, we continue the Comenius Institute summer series, “What will you replace it with when it’s gone?” I am Dr. Mark Eckel, Executive Director of the Center for Biblical Integration at Liberty University, personally seeking truth wherever it’s found. [First published at MarkEckel.com]
*NOTE: I am reproducing some of my exact ideas from 26 January 2017 post at my early website WarpandWoof.org
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (16)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
If you let the government into the business of granting human rights, soon they'll take it on themselves to decide who is human. We've been down that road. It's full of ruts and bumps and the route isn't scenic.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Indeed. Dr. Guillotin certainly helped "pave" that road.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Understand what Canada is doing with their aggressive MAID laws. The nose of the euthanasia camel came into the tent, and is now sitting and feasting at the table as they are using it to fix the insolvency of their broken "healthcare system".
I suspect that we aren't far behind. Starting at the coasts and working its way into the heartlands.
You're seeing five of 16 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.