Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Conservatives tend to support freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom to buy whatever light bulbs make you happy, and so on. Leftism tends to be based more on centralized control systems, and is more comfortable with censorship and government involvement in things like light bulbs and gas stoves. Political violence is a feature of the left, presumably because you sometimes need violence to get someone to do something that they normally wouldn’t do. Conservatives don’t need violence to get people to do whatever they want. Which is why it's so hard to imagine JD Vance looking like Elizabeth Warren in this picture.
But it occurs to me that there may be another reason for the anger and violence on the left. Leftists believe that they are the smart ones, and the virtuous ones. And then they look at places that apply leftism, which are typically horrifying. The 20th century was a nightmare for them, as leftist leaders like Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Castro, et al. caused so much suffering and destruction. American cities have been governed by Democrat governors for decades, and are nearly without exception spiraling into dystopian hell-holes. People are leaving Democrat states and moving to Republican states en masse. If leftism is so smart and so virtuous, why does it consistently lead to such suffering and destruction? Why do people run away from it? If leftism is so smart and so virtuous, shouldn’t it work? At least sometimes?
This would have to be painful for leftists. The cognitive dissonance would become increasingly difficult to ignore. In the dark of night, when they’re alone with their thoughts, perhaps they might start thinking some uncomfortable thoughts, such as: “Is it really possible that personal freedom is preferable to centralized control by well-meaning, educated intellectuals? Could my stupid, uneducated, sarcastic brother-in-law actually have a point? Oh my God - was I wrong the whole time? Was I complicit in the suffering and murder of millions of innocents? Is that really possible?”
Such thoughts would be very unpleasant. The natural response to such thoughts is, “Of course not. My brother-in-law is a jerk. Government is simply the name we give to things we do together. Cooperation is nice. America is a racist, sexist, colonial power that is a danger to the world. We just need to get others to understand this. With whatever means necessary.”
I understand that impulse. Considering the idea that you were wrong about so many very important things would be very painful. Emotional self-defense is an understandable response. Not admirable. But understandable.
As conservatives are becoming more distressed about the direction of the Western world, and as conservatives appear to be gaining a better understanding of the situation they find themselves in, this will tend to lead to more conspiracy theories on the left. Fact-checking only became necessary once the facts started getting out. The left has a problem. With reality. And with facts. And they know it.
That has to hurt.
So they lash out, like a wounded dog.
They will not go quietly into the night. They just can’t. They’re stuck.
This is ugly. And it’s going to get uglier.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (65)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Leftism is about egos. Just try telling one when discussing one of Their pet projects, "It's none of Yer damn business."
There are 2 ways to elevate Yerself: self improvement or standing on others.
Leftist elevate Their egos by "fighting for the less fortunate" and They turn violent, because Their reasons are not convincing.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
When a certain crazy elder relative and his "conspiracy theories" keep turning out to be true ...
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
What you are saying is nominally true, but it would be wise for us to apply this lesson to ourselves rather than just feeling smug toward the Left.
Conservatives spent the 1990s with our thumbs up our bums while the Bush faction took over the GOP, all while disingenuously wearing the skin-suit or Reagan's legacy. By 2001 we were shocked (although we shouldn't have been) to discover that a GOP controlled White House, Senate and House were governing to the left of where we were under Clinton.
Our blindness here was due to our own cognitive dissonance. We so badly wanted to believe that the GOP was still the party of Reagan and that if we elected George W it would be Reagan 2.0, that we ignored a host of warning signs.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The only reason Clinton moved to the right in his second term was because of the Gingrich congress. I could be wrong but I believe Bush 2001 would have been much more conservative and focused domestically except for the circumstances of 9/11. That shifted things tremendously.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
With Leftism, the ends always justify the means. The ends is an unobtainable communist utopia.
You're seeing five of 65 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.