3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Stupid Jews Make Me Nuts
May 6, 2024 at 3:23 PM

Stupid Jews Make Me Nuts

iWe
@iWe

CHARTER MEMBER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark22likesJoin to like14comments

The only thing worse than an ignorant person is a person who does not know they are ignorant: they think that they are wise and intelligent, philosopher kings in all things. It is one reason why I hate politicians so deeply: they are so very certain of their wisdom and expertise as they shove it down our throats as if it were all really “for our own good.”

I have this same problem with people who were born into Jewish families, but know less than nothing about Torah Judaism – which does not stop them from dismissing the Torah as “foolish and superstitious.” They grow up secure in the knowledge that they are more enlightened than all their forebears: that they are, in fact, too enlightened to believe in anything at all, except their own intellectual greatness.

The problem is that these very same people of Jewish ancestry retain an obnoxious (if effective) sliver of what it means to be a Jew: to proclaim what you think is right, even if everyone else disagrees with you (trust me, I am aware of the irony). They might not be right, but that certainly won’t make them shut up.

I happen to believe that the most evil and destructive anti-Torah people were, invariably, born Jewish. Spinoza. Marx. Freud. And many others.

The devils of our age are fallen angels. Like the Satan of Christianity, these evildoers started off with the possibility of being forces for good – but then they could not resist the intoxicating temptation to turn others away from G-d: they fell just as surely as Satan did.

Note that I do not call these born-Jews “stupid.” For they were most assuredly supremely gifted in intellectual capability. But being smart did not make Spinoza wise: he attacked the concepts of free will, revealed religion, received ideas, tradition, and morality. A Jew who left school at the age of 14 considered himself sufficiently wise to discard everything that made his very existence possible. The world of intellectuals lapped it up, conforming as it did to their own conceits about the superiority of the intellect over religion.

Which brings us to the founder of Communism. Marx was no dummy. He was just wrong. The death toll from his misbegotten and totally ignorant ideas is mind-boggling, dwarfed only by the opportunity cost of what might have been if his ideas had never been shared. Another devil.

And Freud? While Marxism killed an enormous number of people, Freudianism, the dominant way of thinking about peoples’ very thoughts in most of the 20th century, continues to plague us today. Freud taught that nothing is really our fault. Freud attacked the notion of true personal responsibility, spreading the mind virus that none of us are truly capable of free will. That belief is, of course, a self-fulfilling prophecy. Freud’s diseased logic built right off Spinoza and yes, even Marx, who believed that external forces necessarily and always overcome the individual. And people adore this way of thinking: Freudianism justified every self-indulgent neurosis, sucking away human potential and creative energies. He gave everyone license to follow their appetites and blame others for them, to wallow in navel gazing and learned helplessness. Freud produced the intellectual bedrock of today’s diseased society.

Thanks to Freud, for 50 years, the world of intellectuals knew – beyond a shadow of a doubt – that any male who denied lusting after his mother was, of a certainty, just reinforcing the fact of that lust. The entire logic is bonkers. It was bonkers then, too. But that didn’t stop smart people from believing it. Beware of ignorant Jews.

I read recently of the famous “Anna,” a subject of Freud’s work. This poor woman was almost killed by the “treatment” administered to her.

According to Breuer, the many hours he spent with Pappenheim ultimately resulted, in 1882, in her complete cure. But Breuer’s actions belied his claim. That year, Breuer had her transferred to a sanitarium, where she spent most of the next two years and another two months in 1887. During the course of her stays, she was probably treated with and became addicted to morphine, in addition to chloral hydrate. Talking, alas, was not a miracle cure after all. Eventually, she got away. And she straightened herself out. By the turn of the century, she had achieved prominence as an advocate and activist for vulnerable women and families. She founded the social-welfare organization the League of Jewish Women (ultimately dissolved by Hitler) and was a pioneer in the fight against international sex trafficking. Because her personal papers did not survive World War II, there is much more about her life that we do not and cannot know, including how she herself looked back on her psychological ordeal. One clue: She reportedly remarked that “as long as I live, psychoanalysis will never penetrate” her organizations.

And Freud’s made-up fantasies about this very woman became the basis of all “educated” ways of thinking about how people think?! It is sheer madness.

And we have yet to outgrow it! Our own Joseph Epstein recently reviewed a book about Freud. Absent were any of the observations seen above, the fact that Freudianism has enabled and authorized every whining self-obsessed activist today, the fact that it sucks free will and positive individual growth out of every society it touches. Instead, Epstein ends the review with:

Psychoanalysis was never about morality, either teaching it or practicing it. It was, and remains, instead, about healthy skepticism, about rejecting the illusions of full-time happiness and instead living in acceptance of what Freud, along with Josef Breuer in their book, “Studies on Hysteria” (1895), called “ordinary unhappiness.” The therapist Susie Orbach, in her essay in “On the Couch,” takes this phrase to mean not living in unhappiness but being able “to live inside and from oneself with all its conflicts and longings and the connections it is possible to make with others.” Ordinary unhappiness—sounds to me not a bad place to be. Where do I get a ticket?

If I was not so angry, I would weep.

Of course, we today are no strangers to mass psychosis. Indeed, we tend to focus on the irrationalities of our age. In 2024, we are still infected by the practitioners of the Covid Mask, publicly declaring their eagerness to wallow in human frailty and fear.

But we must not forget that mass madness is as old as time. The English used to be obsessed with rabies from their dogs, even though death rates were low – while tuberculosis cut through the population like a scythe. Nobody cared then. And nobody cares about facts like this now.

We have been poisoned by these fallen angels to think that there is no free will, that the individual is not important, that Philosopher Kings can and should dictate the affairs of men for the Greater Good. We are taught that nothing is our own fault – we can blame nature or nurture, but certainly not ourselves, never ourselves.

Jews who know nothing of the Torah become its greatest enemies. I am pretty sure that Spinoza, Marx and Freud, for all their ignorance, knew at least that much.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (14)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Dr. Bastiat@drbastiat·2y
    iWe (View Post):
    Jews who know nothing of the Torah become its greatest enemies.

    This happens in Christianity, as well...

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·2y

    I'd deny that Marx wasn't stupid. His perfect, classless state free of government was never going to happen. Attempting to realize the phase he saw as transitional (central planning of all economic activity) was going to result in more government, not less, with no limiting factor. The State was never going to wither away. He believed that his half-witted, threadbare theology would transform human nature. Utter bosh.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    iWe@iWe·2y
    ReplyingtoPercival

    Percival (View Comment):

    I’d deny that Marx wasn’t stupid. His perfect, classless state free of government was never going to happen. Attempting to realize the phase he saw as transitional (central planning of all economic activity) was going to result in more government, not less, with no limiting factor. The State was never going to wither away. He believed that his half-witted, threadbare theology would transform human nature. Utter bosh.

    His ideas were wrong. But his brilliance may well have been in the marketing of them. One way or another, Marxism seduced an awful lot of people.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·2y
    ReplyingtoiWe

    Percival (View Comment):

    I’d deny that Marx wasn’t stupid. His perfect, classless state free of government was never going to happen. Attempting to realize the phase he saw as transitional (central planning of all economic activity) was going to result in more government, not less, with no limiting factor. The State was never going to wither away. He believed that his half-witted, threadbare theology would transform human nature. Utter bosh.

    iWe (View Comment):

    His ideas were wrong. But his brilliance may well have been in the marketing of them. One way or another, Marxism seduced an awful lot of people.

    Someone, somewhere, is the world's best seller of tripe. But it's still only tripe. Marx's socioeconomic version was poisonous. It got a lot of people killed.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    iWe@iWe·2y
    ReplyingtoPercival

    Percival (View Comment):

    Someone, somewhere, is the world’s best seller of tripe. But it’s still only tripe. Marx’s socioeconomic version was poisonous. It got a lot of people killed.

    I absolutely agree. I am just making a distinction between tripe that sells and tripe that does not. The former reflects some kind of genius. We may not like evil people, but we would be fools to ignore them.

Scroll for later comments
+9 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 14 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •