Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
There was a brilliant post yesterday about writing techniques in political propaganda. The article it discussed involved leftist disdain for stay-at-home moms. One normally thinks of a mother as the most wholesome of images, so convincing a majority of the population that stay-at-home moms are somehow devious and evil would seem to be a difficult goal. Why bother? Why do leftists want us all to hate stay-at-home moms so much? I have a few theories:
A few of those rationalizations make some sense, to a degree. Although, remember that I’m not writing about why it’s important that women have the opportunity to work outside the home – I think all of us agree on the benefits of everyone in society having the same opportunities. And this is not about families who decide that it would better if both parents worked, to improve their situation. That’s not at all what this is about.
This is about why leftists think that no woman should be a stay-at-home mom. Modern feminism is not pro-choice. Not in this realm. They think that any woman who chooses to be a stay-at-home mom is a failure or, even worse, a Republican. So I think all of those reasons above play some role in their extreme distaste for traditional stay-at-home moms.
But I suspect that there is one other reason, that may be more important than all the others:
I think this may be the main problem with stay-at-home moms to Democrats.
Leftism is not about hope and love. It is about resentment and hate.
Democrats are known for raising taxes on the wealthy to pay for social programs for the poor. Those social programs usually make things worse for the poor people they ostensibly were designed to help. Sometimes MUCH worse. But that doesn’t matter. They keep doing it.
Because Democrats don’t love poor people. They just hate rich people.
This is similar, I think. I’m not sure that feminists hate stay-at-home moms as much as they hate the husbands who make such decisions possible.
I can understand why Democrats view stay-at-home moms as such a threat. They symbolize much of what is right with conservatism, and much of what is wrong with leftism. In many different ways, as I listed above.
But I’m beginning to suspect that hatred of stay-at-home moms is more about the dads. Down with the patriarchy. It takes a village to raise a child, not two parents. The state is more important than the family. An independent family unit doesn’t need government, and is less likely to care what government wants them to do or think.
To the left, fathers are the real threat.
And this is just one more way to attack them.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (60)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Which brings me to this again:
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
It's female logic. They do it all the time. When you point it out, you sleep on the sofa.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Naw. If she's that upset, SHE can sleep on the sofa.
I paid for the sofa too, and the room it's in, but she can sleep there if she wants to.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yes, and Leftists are neo-Marxists that will support things that destroy institutions and/or create enmity among the people. Division is the tool and destruction and power is the goal.
You're seeing five of 60 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.