The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowFederalist Radio HourNot Dead YetHeritage ExplainsChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe Learning CurveThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourHillsdale DialoguesMom WarsWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusFirst Things PodcastThe Glenn ShowThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  1. Main Feed/
  2. Propose Eliminating Girls’ and Women’s Sports
February 16, 2024 at 2:07 PM

Propose Eliminating Girls’ and Women’s Sports

Full Size Tabby
@FullSizeTabby

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark16likesJoin to like42comments

Is this idea too nuts because some wacko place might actually adopt it?

I am seeing more frequent stories about males (boys and men) - many of whom competed as males in male sports - choosing to compete in female sports. Their defenders tell us that not allowing that is "unfair" (to the male who wants to compete as a female; no discussion of fairness to the displaced females allowed). How about we test their seriousness by proposing to eliminate the separate categories for girls' and women's sports? Rather than having males compete somewhat subtly against females, let's bring it out into the open.

Many people have pointed out that continuing to let males compete in "female" sports will eventually render "female" sports irrelevant. More males are figuring out that rather than being second-tier competitors in male sports, they can be top-tier competitors in female sports. If males continue to be allowed to compete in female sports, more males will do so. Eventually, males will dominate and take over the "female" sports. "Female" sports will be no more.

My proposal is to get that discussion about ending female sports out in the open, rather than letting female sports become sick and die gradually.

I realize the proposal carries some risk that some lunatic government body (such as the San Francisco School Board, or the Seattle City Council or the California Legislature) might actually adopt it. But I would like to hear discussed in the open the explanations of why females who want to compete in sports should defer to male competitors, and let males dominate the competitions.

To some extent the same discussion could be prompted by a proposal to eliminate separate girls' and women's physical spaces such as restrooms and locker rooms. But so far males don't seem to have pushed that idea as far as they have the sports.

Girls' and women's sports were created to allow females to compete against other females, rather than against males who are in many ways very different physically from females. In a number of areas in which society maintains segregation by sex, eliminating that segregation puts females at a disadvantage, requiring them to defer to males. Why is that a good thing? Make those who advocate it explain in the open, without hiding in the language of the make believe world of "gender identity."

Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (42)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • Banned Member@DrewInWisconsin·2y

    I'd be surprised if the idea wasn't fully embraced by the gender crazies.

    Society has already eliminated male-only spaces and is obviously working hard to eliminate female-only spaces, too.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)@DonG·2y
    ReplyingtoDrewInLowerOrderAutonomousZone

    DrewInLowerOrderAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    I’d be surprised if the idea wasn’t fully embraced by the gender crazies.

    Society has already eliminated male-only spaces and is obviously working hard to eliminate female-only spaces, too.

    But the point is the neo-Marxist divisiveness. Divide the people in cultural wars and then they are defeated.

  • Banned Member@DrewInWisconsin·2y
    ReplyingtoDonG (CAGW is a Scam)

    DrewInLowerOrderAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    I’d be surprised if the idea wasn’t fully embraced by the gender crazies.

    Society has already eliminated male-only spaces and is obviously working hard to eliminate female-only spaces, too.

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    But the point is the neo-Marxist divisiveness. Divide the people in cultural wars and then they are defeated.

    And by keeping them divided, they can't unite against the real threat: our own government.

  • BT

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bob Thompson@BobThompson·2y

    Create a new category for sissies and tomboys.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Tex929rr@Tex929rr·2y

    It would sure force people to pick sides. That would be very revealing.

+37 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 42 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •