The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureFederalist Radio HourGiving VenturesWho Funds that?Daily SignalHillsdale DialoguesChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHeritage ExplainsThe Erick Erickson ShowThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Back of the BookMom WarsWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesThe Learning CurveNot Dead YetFirst Things PodcastThe Conservative Woman’s GuideThe Glenn ShowLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Become a member.Become a Ricochet member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. New Low in Minnesota
November 25, 2025 at 10:50 PM

New Low in Minnesota

Old Bathos
@OldBathos

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark24likesJoin to like22comments

In August, a jury took only four hours to review copious evidence to find Abdifatah Yusuf guilty of fraud. He owned and operated a number of non-existent medical care providers operating out of a single mailbox to steal $7.2 million from public funds. Even AG Keith Ellison praised this conviction.

However, this month, Hennepin County trial judge Sarah West has ruled that the conviction cannot stand because it was really just circumstantial evidence. The state failed to rule out "other reasonable inferences." The mind boggles. What other innocent explanation is possible from these facts?

Our new Somali friends (Remember: Diversity Is Our Strength!!) have probably looted a billion dollars from Minnesota welfare and health programs, even diverting funds to Somali terrorist groups along with conspicuous instances of exorbitant personal spending (as in the case of Abdifatah Yusuf). But the important thing is that we don't judge and keep searching for a positive interpretation of the facts.

Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (22)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Addiction Is A Choice@AddictionIsAChoice·47w

    To get any lower, we'll have to dig a ditch!

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Michael Minnott@MichaelMinnott·47w

    Can the prosecutors appeal the judge's decision here?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Old Bathos@OldBathos·47w
    ReplyingtoMichael Minnott

    Michael Minnott (View Comment):

    Can the prosecutors appeal the judge’s decision here?

    Yes. But Minnesota Appellate Courts are not exactly MAGA territory. Then again, my guess is that they will find a way to toss her ruling because it was embarrassing even by Minnesota liberal standards.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·47w
    ReplyingtoOld Bathos

    Michael Minnott (View Comment):

    Can the prosecutors appeal the judge’s decision here?

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Yes. But Minnesota Appellate Courts are not exactly MAGA territory. Then again, my guess is that they will find a way to toss her ruling because it was embarrassing even by Minnesota liberal standards.

    I hope they do SOMETHING that rejects her decision. You're right: it's embarrassing!

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Doug Watt@DougWatt·47w
    However, this month, Hennepin county trial judge Sarah West has ruled that the conviction cannot stand because it was really just circumstantial evidence. The state failed to rule out “other reasonable inferences.” The mind boggles. What other, innocent explanation is possible from these facts?

    Silly me, I assumed that the defense is supposed to offer “other reasonable inferences.” Did this guy wake up one morning and discover 7.2 million had been delivered to his mailbox. I suppose that a Martian could have been sending the money to his mailbox, but then again, the defense would have to produce said generous Martian.

+17 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 22 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •