Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 40 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Newspeak and the B Vocabulary
This post was inspired by Brian Watt’s post, A Helpful Guide to Cancelling “Mother”. Reading of Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers’ proposal to replace “mother” with “inseminated person” made me wonder if there shouldn’t be some award akin to the popular Darwin Awards to be presented for torturing language for political ends. Something, say, called “Orwell Awards” — in honor of George Orwell’s NewSpeak Dictionary from his dystopian novel, 1984. But, it turns out that there is in fact an existing Orwell Award that, sadly, stands for exactly the opposite:
It is awarded annually to “writers who have made outstanding contributions to the critical analysis of public discourse.”[1]
The closest thing that comes to my conception is a Doublespeak Award presented by the same organization as the Orwell Award:
An ironic tribute to public speakers who have perpetuated language that is grossly deceptive, evasive, euphemistic, confusing, or self-centered.
But this doesn’t get quite to my meaning. The award I have in mind would be presented to persons who really embrace the spirit that George Orwell described:
Newspeak was … devised to meet the ideological needs of Ingsoc, or English Socialism.
***
The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought — that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc — should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words.
In Orwell’s description of Newspeak, he differentiated between three categories of words: Basic words that were needed to indicate directions or basic needs such as eating, drinking, working (the “A” vocabulary); scientific terms (labeled the “C” vocabulary); and “words which had been deliberately constructed for political purposes” (the “B” vocabulary). Here is a fuller explanation of the B vocabulary:
Without a full understanding of the principles of Ingsoc it was difficult to use these words correctly.
***
The B words were in all cases compound words….They consisted of two or more words, or portions of words, welded together in an easily pronounceable form.
***
But the special function of certain Newspeak words…was not so much to express meanings as to destroy them.
***
As we have already seen in the case of the word FREE, words which had once borne a heretical meaning were sometimes retained for the sake of convenience, but only with the undesirable meaning purged out of them.
***
No word in the B vocabulary was ideologically neutral.
***
So far as it could be contrived, everything that had or might have political significance of any kind was fitted into the B vocabulary.
***
Relative to our own, the Newspeak vocabulary was tiny, and new ways of reducing it were constantly being devised. Newspeak, indeed, differed from most all other languages in that its vocabulary grew smaller instead of larger every year. Each reduction was a gain, since the smaller the area of choice, the smaller the temptation to take thought. Ultimately it was hoped to make articulate speech issue from the larynx without involving the high brain centres at all.
–George Orwell’s 1984, Appendix
When you read this section — the description of Orwell’s Newspeak B vocabulary and its intention — do you not recognize an affinity between “inseminated person,” “anti-fascist,” “anti-racism,” and the like with Orwell’s Newspeak? Of course, in Orwell’s formulation, “inseminated person” would likely become INSEMSON. In this way, “mother” (two syllables) would be replaced by INSEMSON (three syllables) rather than Evers’ seven-syllable monster.
All of these progressive speech inventions clearly carry out the intention of Newspeak. “Anti-fascism” is actually fascist; “Anti-racism” is actually racist. This goes beyond the Doublespeak Awards that make fun of verbal foibles or incomplete deceptions easily unmasked and ridiculed. Newspeak is an attack on truth itself.
Is there also not an affinity between “talking points” and Newspeak? The same words repeated endlessly from multiple outlets in both legacy and social media. When the same word — not the same concept, the identical word — is expressed with discipline and persistence you are experiencing a Newspeak moment.
As Orwell stated: “Ultimately it was hoped to make articulate speech issue from the larynx without involving the high brain centres at all.”
The purveyors of Newspeak need to be called out, every time, employing the same technique: “That is Newspeak”. Let’s make it a thing. Language must grow and develop ever greater nuance, not atrophy in service to tyranny.
Maybe the worst offenders should receive Newspeak Awards.
Published in General
This is perfect–
I’m in the process of viewing an eight part series from Hillsdale College on well-known totalitarian novels. You only need to go here–https://online.hillsdale.edu/courses/promo/totalitarian-novels— set up an account and sign up for the series. They ask for donations but it’s not required. I’m thoroughly enjoying the series–if enjoying is the right word–and highly recommend it.
Call them the Georgie Awards. There can never be too many references to the Bard of Big Brother.
I can’t help but think that the “inseminated person” construction seems to have been created by an impoopinated one.
AOC. Jamie Raskin. Sheldon Whitehouse.
Just the first three who popped into my mind prompted by the quotation. Unfortunately, the left provides copious proofs of its verity.
A curious thing about an inseminated person is that insemination doesn’t guaranty a person becomes a mother, especially if an abortion comes about after an egg is fertilized. Their brains don’t work right.
I guess even Evers recognized that “successfully inseminated person” at 11 syllables was over the top.
There are also a number of Directors from the former eastern bloc that have created movies about communism that are good
e.g. “Mr Jones”
“Dear Comrades”
“Afterimage”
Yes I think I’ve told the story here before. About 10 years ago I was at a contracting meeting for the state of Minnesota. My organization was seeking a contract with the Minnesota medical assistance program. The contract specialist from the state who was answering questions about contract details told us that they were changing the name of gender reassignment surgery to gender confirmation surgery. The room went dead silent. People looked at each other with a definite WTF look on their face.
With trans ideology still ascendent I guess I cannot resume the proper practice of calling cis-female persons “Gyno-Americans.”
I do love creating terms by adding “-challenged” or “-adjacent.” We should keep that.
I thought the point of a euphemism was to soften offensive terms, to make difficult conversations easier… Going from mother to “Inseminated Person” seems going backwards – turning the gentle term into the lewd… Whats next? Fathers with be M*****F*****? I think women who happen to be mothers would have a visceral reaction to being called a “Inseminated Person”…
I do like the idea of an Orwellian Award program to saturize those who would butcher the English language to dilute the possibility of clarity and understanding.
Also, to state the obvious, the word Mother is also a verb, meaning nurture or protect. Nothing directly to do with insemination. And, as a noun, mother can be anything that gives birth to something, or originates something. Ask Frank Zappa.
So this whole thing is less merely silly, and more simply unnecessarily confusing, and not a little insulting.
This dude is a governor? I would normally say “We are doomed”, but maybe we are in good shape: if the leaders of the democrats are this far gone, maybe we’re winning. Or have already won.
I heard somewhere that the legislation was drawn up by others, and he didn’t bother to read it before he signed it. Sheesh.
Nothing goes to a governor that is not screened by aides who presumably also monitor the content and movements of bills before they are passed. Either his staff is incompetent or he and they are so far in the tank for wokeism that they did not even notice how far over the top this was.
Note that this is an entirely passive term. It is nearly literal objectification – women are reduced to a receptacle for body fluids.
That’s aside from the basic inaccuracy in the term. Someone who is inseminated is not inherently fertile, and it could even refer to homosexual acts.
Feminists should march on Madison and pelt the governor with tampons for this.