Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
This episode could be mistaken for the Three Martini Happy Hour, because this week's episode comes with a tangy twist. John Yoo is away this week, so we brought in a ringer to take his place: Prof. Hadley Arkes! Thus this episode become a Positivism-Free Zone, in which we review the deepest ground of the natural law unencumbered by John's usual alarums, excursions, and errors.
The episode comes in three parts: Hadley made some news yesterday, celebrating the retirement of the noted Notre Dame Law professor Gerard V. Bradley, who will be joining Hadley at the James Wilson Institute on Natural Law and the American Founding.
From there Hadley proceeds to answering the question that we've been kicking around ever since the Dobbs decision, namely, just how should pro-life politicians break out of their self-imposed muteness about abortion. Hadley has the strategy.
Finally, we spend some time toward the end getting down some of Hadley's "origin story" that brought him to Leo Strauss's classroom at the University of Chicago back in the 1960s, and key friendships made along the way—especially our late friend and unsung hero Michael Uhlmann.
Note: We had some internet glitches while recording this episode that weren't easily edited or smoothed over, so we ask listeners' indulgence with these hiccups, in return for which we'll present this installment ad-free.
John Yoo
'Lucretia'
Steve Hayward
Discussion (8)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Week in and week out, this is among the best 60-70 minutes I spend each week.
Thanks you...all of you...each of you.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Lucretia could probably hear my shouts of affirmation all the way across the country when she mentioned the young people who always say, "I feel like..." instead of "I think...." Drives me mad.
Interesting discussion on the abortion issue. I agree that the Republicans (to the extent they can with the media deck stacked against them so thoroughly) need to define the terms of debate. Make them defend the born-alive abortion position, and, as Hadley said, work back from there. As Lucretia said, the Dems will try to defend that extremist position, but they will turn off a lot of people when they do. Make them defend it the way they always seek to make us try to defend the no-exception for rape and incest position. Good analogy from Steve on Lincoln calling to prohibit slavery in the territories.
Hadley is a great guest and I hope he can come back. That said, I also missed John. Not once did I say, "Oh, come on!"
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The government can't force anybody to provide a decent level of prenatal care. Leave it at 15 weeks and drop the subject. Otherwise, this is stupid and it's political suicide. That's what it comes down to.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Right on on the feeling instead of thinking, Lucretia!
I hear from students sometimes that abortion in the case of rape is ok (even if the fetus is a human being with rights!) because the woman is just trying to deal with the consequences of her trauma.
It's pretty lousy thinking. I'm sure they don't think the poor woman has a right to kill the rapist if she thinks that will help with the trauma. But for some reason she has the right to kill her baby instead?????
Very likely this is a result of having some feels about the abortion issue and trying, inartfully, to covert them to thoughts.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
We don’t have a T.V. Recently, we stayed at a hotel and there were many commercials for Planned Parenthood which never mentioned abortion. It may not be as winning an issue as the Dims would have you believe.
You're seeing five of eight comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.