3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Podcasts/
  2. 3 Whisky Happy Hour/
  3. The Three Whisky Happy Hour: Peak Crazy Achieved?
April 8, 2023
April 8, 2023Ricochet

The Three Whisky Happy Hour: Peak Crazy Achieved?

Subscribe to 3 Whisky Happy HourSubscribe

You know how people who think they can top something crazy like to say, "Hold my beer"? Well, this week Budweiser decided to try to top Alvin Bragg's bogus indictment of Donald Trump by rebranding their "light" beer such that no one want to hold it even for Alvin Bragg. What explains this dumbest marketing move since the New Coke? And does the Biden Administration have a political death wish by deciding to use Title IX as a trans-cudgel? ("Trans-cudgel" is one of the 159 genders isn't it?) Yes, this week was that crazy, and we haven't even got to the elections in Chicago and Wisconsin yet.

John Yoo hosts this week's episode, which is good since Steve is under the weather with yet another bug of some kind, necessitating at least three whiskies, while Lucretia adds to her "Moron of the Week" designation with yet another new feature (which will rotate amongst the three of us every week) on . . . political philosophy! Don't groan—it's going to be fun. Especially since Steve demonstrates in this episode how it is possible to sneak up on John unawares with a reference to . . . the verboten Clean Air Act!

Host:
•John Yoo
Guests:
•"Lucretia"•Steve Hayward

Discussion (10)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Quickz@Quickz·3y

    Always love this podcast! Sometimes I savor it for a few days in my feed before listening - it's that good.

    Couple comments, first on the "Trump will lose the General" When people on the right say this I think often it's just because they support another candidate in the primary - that's totally fair, pull for your candidate. But if you want to be honest you have to point out that Trump only "lost" by 40k across 3 states- in an election year of covid lies, fortifying elections, and the most questionable election in modern history.

    To think this cannot be overcome by 1) playing the new voting game better, 2) showing the facts that blame Pelosi and the "intelligence" agencies for allowing 1/6 to happen (no beefed up security - which would have avoided the whole thing), 3) that the Biden Family Business is a real thing and many others in GovCo. are complicit with these back scratching State Department grifts, and 4) maybe promoting the actual policy platforms that are being put out by the campaign (a dozen now?), and 5) having the GOP talking-heads out there soberly point these things out; well that easily take away the biggest current criticisms of Trump. I get it, many want RDS, but when he doesn't win the primary, the talking-heads need to stop with the wah wah we gonna lose BS and push the reality of a resounding win.

    With all those issues neutered by the above steps if you then consider the fact that the Ds/corps/media shot their wad in 2020 - they'll never be able to "fortify" like that again - and it's not only possible but highly likely that Trump can make up the 40k deficit from the last election, and likely do far far better by "playing by the new rules" of voting.

    On those new rules - the large sums of money that D candidates get from outside-of-the-State groups are fed right into their pre-existing GOTV plans. The GOP does not even have those plans, much less the machine to fund to use it. This election, like many others, was lost by the GOP apparatus itself. Ronna McDaniel strikes again. If you think I am wrong, where was the immediate lawsuit over the illegal gift cards for votes? No case even filed. Flat-footed because there IS NO GOP GOTV MACHINE.

    It might not be there because someone ... *wants* to lose?

    Keep up the AmAzInG Podcasts!

  • PODCAST ORGANIZATION

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Steven Hayward@StevenHayward·3y
    ReplyingtoQuickz

    Quickz (View Comment):

    Always love this podcast! Sometimes I savor it for a few days in my feed before listening – it’s that good.

    Couple comments, first on the “Trump will lose the General” When people on the right say this I think often it’s just because they support another candidate in the primary – that’s totally fair, pull for your candidate. But if you want to be honest you have to point out that Trump only “lost” by 40k across 3 states- in an election year of covid lies, fortifying elections, and the most questionable election in modern history.

    To think this cannot be overcome by 1) playing the new voting game better, 2) showing the facts that blame Pelosi and the “intelligence” agencies for allowing 1/6 to happen (no beefed up security – which would have avoided the whole thing), 3) that the Biden Family Business is a real thing and many others in GovCo. are complicit with these back scratching State Department grifts, and 4) maybe promoting the actual policy platforms that are being put out by the campaign (a dozen now?), and 5) having the GOP talking-heads out there soberly point these things out; well that easily take away the biggest current criticisms of Trump. I get it, many want RDS, but when he doesn’t win the primary, the talking-heads need to stop with the wah wah we gonna lose BS and push the reality of a resounding win.

    With all those issues neutered by the above steps if you then consider the fact that the Ds/corps/media shot their wad in 2020 – they’ll never be able to “fortify” like that again – and it’s not only possible but highly likely that Trump can make up the 40k deficit from the last election, and likely do far far better by “playing by the new rules” of voting.

    On those new rules – the large sums of money that D candidates get from outside-of-the-State groups are fed right into their pre-existing GOTV plans. The GOP does not even have those plans, much less the machine to fund to use it. This election, like many others, was lost by the GOP apparatus itself. Ronna McDaniel strikes again. If you think I am wrong, where was the immediate lawsuit over the illegal gift cards for votes? No case even filed. Flat-footed because there IS NO GOP GOTV MACHINE.

    It might not be there because someone … *wants* to lose?

    Keep up the AmAzInG Podcasts!

    Thanks. BTW and for the record, I think Trump can win in 2024 depending on general conditions (meaning Biden's record and obvious decrepitude), but it's a gamble. But if he does win, Trump would be limited to just a single term. What we really need now is a two-term president with clarity of goals and skill to see it through. We'll be discussing this along the way of course.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Peter Meza@PeterMeza·3y

    What was that song at the end? Siri had a lot of candidates but they were all wrong.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Leslie Watkins@LeslieWatkins·3y

    Regarding John’s question why it took seventeen hundred years to progress from the idea of the inherent equality of all human beings (given to humankind by Christianity) to the idea of individual equality under the law (given to humankind by the founders of the United States), I offer the view of Rose Wilder Lane. (A successful writer in her own right, Lane was the daughter of Laura Ingalls Wilder and is credited with encouraging her mother to write the Little House on the Prairie.)

    In her book The Discovery of Freedom (1943, before Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom), Lane focuses on Man’s [historical] Struggle against Authority (the book’s subtitle) and proffers the view that, in the Old World, individual Christians were viewed as being equal before god, but their philosophical and creative energies were stymied by having to live under the authority of the state. In the New World, however, as exemplified by the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the political separation of church and state, and the emergence of individual rights as granted by the U.S. Constitution, humankind discovered freedom from authority (historically a mixed blessing, it should be noted). For Lane, what makes the New World unique is that it enabled the sovereign individual to come to life.

  • PODCAST ORGANIZATION

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Steven Hayward@StevenHayward·3y
    ReplyingtoPeter Meza

    Peter Meza (View Comment):

    What was that song at the end? Siri had a lot of candidates but they were all wrong.

    I did it again—forgot to include exit music info in the show notes. It's Bragh Adair (again, like last week), "Cloud of Witnesses."

+5 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of ten comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •