Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Who needs a rockin' new year's party when you have the Three Whisky Happy Hour in peak form, dishing out on the top stories of 2023, and, in the spirit of the late financial analyst Byron Wein, offering a range of potential low-probability surprises (rather than firm predictions) for 2024.
What's the difference between a prediction and a surprise? Well think about it this way: who would have predicted, at year end 2022, that right now our favorite Democratic Senator would be . . . John Fetterman? Black swans everywhere are saying, "I did NOT see that coming!"
But before getting started with your 2024 Bingo card we take note of the dumbest controversy of the week, which is seeing some conservatives upset at the “Conservative Dad’s Real Women of America” 2024 calendar, which features fetching photos of leading conservative heroines such as Riley Gaines in fashionable attire. Like bikinis.
Along the way we learn that somewhere in a box in her garage, Lucretia has some modeling photos from her time doing the Jane Fonda workout back in the 1980s, and so we're committing ourselves to producing a 3WHH calendar at some point. (Meanwhile, Steve laments the loss of the classic Snap-On Tools calendars, which were discontinued in 1994. And why hasn’t Snap-On thought of reviving that calendar for our transgender moment?)
And speaking of attractive women in unattractive poses, Nikki Haley got her second strike this week (her first being the blunder several weeks ago of proposing to ban anonymous accounts on social media) when she completely flubbed the "planted" question about the cause of the Civil War. We deplore her Kamala-esque answer and attempts a cleaning it up, but are relieved that at least she didn't say "tariffs."
And as befits any fast-moving party conversation, we take surprising digressions, such as a detour into the legacy of Edward Tufte, who reminds us that Stalin had the greatest Power Point presentations ("no one has bullet points like Stalin's bullet points!") and also the single greatest chart of all time.
Eventually we get down to business with our picks for Story of the Year for 2023 (hint: Steve says "party like it's 1954!"), and our surprises for 2024. Get your Bingo cards ready. And also enjoy our exit bumper music this week from Spike Jones. Happy new year!
Steve Hayward
"Lucretia"
Discussion (12)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Lately, I've been comparing Pat Benatar's career to Taylor Swift's. Benatar may not have been quite as popular as Swift. I don't think she had a concert where the audience was so raucus that it set off seismic sensors.
Yet, as I lived through the period I noticed that a lot of young women of the time had what I called the Pat Benetar look, which included their emulating her hairstyle.
So when Lucretia said that she modeled herself after Benater when she was young, that was another datapoint for me.
Today, the young women of today would not remember who Benatar was. But she had a pretty smooth glide path from her time as a top of the charts pop star. She still performs, obviously to dedicated older audiences, and from what I can see from Wikipedia, she has dealt with her fall from the top very well.
I predict the same for Taylor Swift. If she continues to perform, or chooses to retire, she'll have a pretty good life. She's business savvy, so she'll continue to have an impactful life behind the scenes, but culturally no one will know who she is, much like Benatar. She's ambitious enough to want her music to be longer lasting than it is, but I'm not seeing it. Her adherents are too limited to young women, and I suspect that her music isn't crossing over to the black or hispanic communities or men of all American sub-cultures.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
On John Yoo's assertion that all the Chinese have to do is wait regarding the takeover of Taiwan, and that time is on China's side, I say not entirely.
China has a low fertility rate, and at some point, that's going to affect military "recruitment" if it hasn't already.
According to Google, Taiwan has a slightly lower fertility rate than China, but there's evidence that what China releases as statistics should be taken with a grain of salt.
As far as the interests of the United States and Taiwan, already chip factories are moving to other countries, including Mexico. As an aside, China has been buying or building their own factories in Mexico, which is a concern for us, but it also highlights that China has less people coming to adulthood to man the factories it has in their own country.
There are plenty of experts who think that China's demographic crisis will result in an economic collapse. There are other countries like Japan that are better dealing with their own demographic problems. With their top down control economy, China won't be able to adjust to their own future.
Taiwan will also probably be able to adjust better to their own lower population than China does.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You included the infographic in the post. Here's a video explaining it.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Very cool.
PODCAST ORGANIZATION
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Thanks!
You're seeing five of twelve comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.