Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Steven Teles of Johns Hopkins University is a rare liberal who writes with great perception and fairness about conservatism and conservative ideas. In this episode, Steve Hayward talks with Teles about his fine new book (co-authored with Brink Lindsay) "The Captured Economy," and also about liberalism, intellectual history, and especially about the need for more conservatives in higher education.
Hosted by Steve Hayward, with guest STSteven Teles
Discussion (5)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
CONTRIBUTOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I had exactly that reaction.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I know, right?
CONTRIBUTOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
On a more serious note, I disagree with his initial point that you can't be against crony capitalism unless you're also against inequality. The problem with crony capitalism isn't that it makes jerks rich, it's that the jerks are also actively making everyone else poorer to get there. To the extent that other aspects of capitalism work that way (e.g. fraud) they're outlawed.
Cornelius Flibbertigibbet is a real louse of a human being who builds a better lawn mower. People spend less time mowing their lawns, he gets rich, everyone is happy. Except for the people who have to deal with him personally, but that wasn't going to change.
Beauregard Malefactor is a fine, upstanding vegan who cares about black lives and runs a multinational lawn mowing conglomerate. He influences government to outlaw lawnmowers that aren't, technically speaking, made by him. They're more expensive and they take longer to mow lawns, but Beauregard gets rich.
The problem isn't Beauregard getting rich, it's that he's also making everyone else's lives more miserable doing so.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I prefer calling it crony government rather than calling it crony capitalism. It's about cronies using the government, not capitalism.
I prefer the "lack of economic mobility" over "inequality". There is always going to be some people with more than others. The problem is when government policies make it harder for people to rise up.