Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

The Power Line team gets down to business with the latest Democrat scandals: Hillary Clinton's "clear cut" violation of State Department rules and the Justice Department's criminal corruption charges against Senator Robert Menendez.

The team expires several important questions. Did the White House know about ClintonEmail.com since August? What's Clinton's most ludicrous claim about her email? And is the Obama administration breaking the news of her email account to silence Hillary on the debate over a deal with Iran? Could this happen to a better former Secretary of State? What difference at this point does it make?
And stop being a freeloader like Sen. Menendez, sign up for the Power Line show on iTunes.
Discussion (16)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Obama owns Hillary now. One wrong step, one bad word against Obama, and he'll come down on her (maybe Bill too) with criminal charges just as he did against Menendez.
Obama also owns the Clinton Foundation now. Failure to use some of those funds as he sees fit will also result in charges.
My guess is that Hillary will play ball in the short term, but watch for Clinton, Inc. to find a way out . . .
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
She's got a lot of dirt on him as well though... there may be controls on his enthusiasm.
At the very least, Obama must know that she's tracked and documented a king's ransom of scandals... she may be able to reveal one that doesn't directly implicate herself, and take him down without wrinkling her pantsuit.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The idea (@ 10:50) that "all things being equal most bureaucrats would rather operate in secret" and being "a control freak" is an excuse for not using your employer's email system is laughable. Especially when your employer is the US government (i.e., the taxpayers).
The fact that many Dems will use this or any other fig leaf (perhaps successfully) is just depressing.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Let's assume for a second that Hillary did the offsite server thing for a reason, because she obviously knew this was against the rules if not the law. If you take that assumption, then the private email was done for probably a few reasons:
1. There might be communications that would implicate Hillary in some way.
2. There might be communications that would implicate Barry in some way, and she could use that later.
That's it. Those are the reasons. This is Hillary Hardball. She knowingly violated the law for her own political benefit, and probably personal benefit as well, considering the relationships between foreign entities and the Clinton foundation.
Her whole political career should come crashing down for this, and she can be relegated to the ashbin of history, where embittered failures go to be forgotten.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Given that there is the potential for abuse stated above, there is defense for secrecy in the Executive branch of government in Federalist 70.
"That unity is conducive to energy will not be disputed. Decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch will generally characterize the proceedings of one man in a much more eminent degree than the prodeedings of any greater number; and in proportion as the number is increased, these qualities will be diminished." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 70.
State Department policy would not carry the force of law. For reasons stated by Hamilton, exemptions would and should apply to those at the very top of the State Department, i.e. Secretary of State, carrying on the most sensitive discussions and negotiations with our foreign allies and adversaries.
You're seeing five of 16 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.