Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Settle down class, time for our next lesson. This week we take up how The Federalist explains Article III, the judiciary, and especially the nowadays familiar power of judicial review, which is nowhere specified in the text of the Constitution, and was in fact an issue of controversy and confusion at the time of the founding.
So we start our investigation with Federalist #78, where Alexander Hamilton skillfully walks through the nature of judicial review, and how the American version will differ from the British practice from which we borrowed much, but not everything.
Of course this matter didn't begin to get settled until Marbury vs. Madison in 1803, and not even then in some important respects that we introduce this week, and will return to in our next and concluding class in a few days.
And if your preference is to watch the session and read along with our Power Point slides of excerpts from The Federalist, you can take in the YouTube version here.
Discussion (2)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I have a small nitpick with Lucretia: at one point she said she "doesn't blame" illegal aliens for entering the country. I believe she was simply making the point that of course people from the proverbial s-hole* countries would like to come here. But I just want to say that I do blame the illegal aliens. They're the ones breaking our laws. And I do also blame the Democrats AND the Republicans for keeping the border open. Let it never be forgotten than Trump asked a Republican Senate and a Republican House to fund the border wall -- I believe at $25 Billion -- and Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell refused. Obviously the price tag was not the sticking issue, given the $100+ Billion that we have sent to secure Ukraine's borders, something Mitch McConnell says is the most important thing in the world.
*It was claimed by the fake news -- based on anonymous sources who admitted they weren't present at the time -- that Trump had used the word "s-hole" to describe certain countries. However, multiple U.S. Senators who were in the room went on record to say Trump said no such thing.
Anyway, I always refer to this podcast as "The Lucretia Show," since the other two, while amiable, are dunces who would get hopelessly lost in the weeds if not for our Lady of Arizona.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Enthusiastic agreement with Lucretia.
ricochet.com
Open link
Unexpected disagreement with Lucretia.
ricochet.com
Open link