Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Whither American conservatism is the question on everyone's mind these days. Recently I gave a short talk about this topic with the central thought that the American conservative movement was now entering a distinct third phase of its modern existence, though I took the opportunity to say a few words about my first mentor, the late M. Stanton Evans, and what can be learned from his disposition, which was ahead of its time in many ways.
So yes, it does meant that the guest for this week's episode is me, for which I apologize, though I hope you will enjoy my rendition of some of Stan Evans's greatest hits—and also his timeless insights into the nature of "The Swamp" that is Washington DC, a phrase I think he may have been one of the first to use nearly 50 years ago. At least this is a short episode!
Steve Hayward
Discussion (14)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
This is an insightful and powerful lecture. We owe it to ourselves to understand exactly where the left and right are in this current political climate. I recommend this to all conservative-minded people who need help appreciating what exactly is happening now that we have entered phase three....
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
@Jdetente On a round trip from Monterey to wine tasting in Paso Robles 4 of us regaled ourselves by coming up with every stupid, counter-productive and/or downright destructive political idea we could think of over the past 100 or so years and realized that very, very close to 100% originate from....(wait for it) The LEFT!
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Steven,
I enjoy your PowerLine podcasts, but think you are way out on a limb here. I too thought M. Stanton Evans was one of the stars of the American Conservatism resurgence. I read every one of his books growing up as they came out and found him very insightful. I find it hard to believe he would find Donald Trump favorably disposed as the leader of a Conservatism Phase 3. He would never sponsor someone who was totally ignorant of the Constitution and American History as Trump is. Trump would have simply been the source of many Evans’ witticisms. The efforts of Michael Anton and the Claremont Institute to remake President Trump as a conservative are futile. He is a New York City liberal who was not accepted into Manhattan society and never supported conservative causes. Initially, he entered the 2016 Republican Primaries in order to improve his brand. When he was surprisingly elected he realized he’d have to play a different role. He has few major beliefs: the world and America’s allies have been unfairly taking advantage of America for decades; free trade impoverishes the average working person and tariffs and mercantilisms must be implemented to prevent this; and America should not act as a police force but should avoid all foreign entanglements unless it results in America being compensated in some way (“Saudi Arabia will pay for the several thousand troops transferred from Syria to Saudi Arabia”.) The implication is that the American military is a mercenary force. This is not true and an insult to their dedication and sacrifice. In addition, he has no fiscal discipline and continues to fund larger government with uncontrolled spending. No conservative believes that larger government means more freedom and less personal involvement in our everyday lives. He is not “draining the swamp”, he is adapting to it. He ran a successful family owned business, and is trying to govern the way he ran that business.
I don’t think that the ascendancy of George W. to the presidency was the beginning of Conservatism Phase 2. George W. was a very loyal disciple of his father George H. W. who was not a conservative. H. W. was simply a reversion to Nelson Rockefeller Republicanism. I was disappointed when Reagan chose H. W. as his vice president. I understood why he did it, but I wanted very much for him to choose Jack Kemp. W. followed his father’s lead. it’s true that when the Soviet Union collapsed, the primary glue for the conservative movement which was anti-communism championed by Wm. F. Buckley was dissolved, and no other primary policy took its place. But W. had the disadvantage of having New York City attacked by Islamist militants and destroying the Twin Towers. So the promise of a Conservatism Phase 2 never happened as it tried unsuccessfully to deal with this new threat but could not separate the politics of the Islamist from its religion’s ideology.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I am very much looking forward to your biography of M. Stanton Evans.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I agree that both left and right should understand where they stand in the current political debate. But I don't think the left opposes President Trump because of where he stands. They oppose him simply because he won the 2016 election for president. The left believed that President Obama brought a new matrix into politics. The diversity of the voting public and its growth would ensure that the left would have a permanently winning candidate as a presidential candidate and its legislative candidates. As a result, they could successfully remake their view of how American should work. They thought that Hillary Clinton would be a continuation of the Obama Administration. The left simply cannot accept the results of her incompetent campaign and wants to overturn it by any means necessary. Conservatism is a collection of ideas that have been championed for hundreds of years as to how the world really works. The left is not opposing those ideas, it is opposing President Trump.
You're seeing five of 14 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.