3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenFederalist Radio HourCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Podcasts/
  2. 3 Whisky Happy Hour/
  3. Heather Mac Donald’s Greatest Hits
September 6, 2019
September 6, 2019Ricochet

Heather Mac Donald’s Greatest Hits

Subscribe to 3 Whisky Happy HourSubscribe

This special double-length episode features a wide-ranging conversation with best-selling author and iconoclast Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute, with special focus on her new book, The Diversity Delusion: How Race and Gender Pandering Corrupt the University and Undermine Our Culture. I hosted Heather this week at . . . UC Berkeley (!!), and we decided that rather than going with a set-piece speech, I'd interview her about the full range of topics she's written about.

So we talk about her own intellectual odyssey, the decline of literature in universities, crime and punishment, the drug war, why we'd actually cheer the return of old-fashioned Marxism, as well as the hot button issues of her new book: preferential college admissions and the entire "diversity industrial complex." We even get to the "T-question" (Trump), where Heather remains skeptical and conflicted.

One thing that comes through immediately is how utterly fearless Heather is.

For our exit music today, I discovered what I suspect is one-off artist named Michael $cott, a parody of "Michael Scott" of The Office, who has put to music the script to the famous "diversity training" episode of The Office. Hence the opening teaser of this episode.

Host:
•Steve Hayward
Guest:
•HMHeather Mac Donald

Discussion (9)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Eugene Kriegsmann@EugeneKriegsmann·7y

    What a week!!!! Lucretia and Heather Mac Donald, my two most admired women. This pod was phenomenal. Heather expressed my view of Trump in a way that I have never quite been able to express. She is a force of nature, a fabulous person of absolute integrity and intellectual supremacy. I could listen to Lucretia and Heather Mac Donald to the exclusion of all else. That Steve has made both of them his friends speaks volumes about him. I was initially annoyed when the old HWX podcast ended and Steve took over. I have more and more become a fan of his as I have seen his remarkable erudition and, need I say it, integrity. This podcast has become one of my favorites based on the amount I learn with each episode. More Heather and more Lucretia, there can never be too much of such greatness.

  • PODCAST ORGANIZATION

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Steven Hayward@StevenHayward·7y
    ReplyingtoEugene Kriegsmann

    Eugene Kriegsmann (View Comment):

    What a week!!!! Lucretia and Heather Mac Donald, my two most admired women. This pod was phenomenal. Heather expressed my view of Trump in a way that I have never quite been able to express. She is a force of nature, a fabulous person of absolute integrity and intellectual supremacy. I could listen to Lucretia and Heather Mac Donald to the exclusion of all else. That Steve has made both of them his friends speaks volumes about him. I was initially annoyed when the old HWX podcast ended and Steve took over. I have more and more become a fan of his as I have seen his remarkable erudition and, need I say it, integrity. This podcast has become one of my favorites based on the amount I learn with each episode. More Heather and more Lucretia, there can never be too much of such greatness.

    Thanks much for such a kind comment! You won't have to wait long. Another episode with "Lucretia" is coming very soon.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Full Size Tabby@FullSizeTabby·7y

    I'm astonished that colleges are still pushing unprepared students into schools for which they are not prepared in the name of "diversity" (in my day "affirmative action"). My late father was pointing out forty years ago that such actions were harming the very students the college administration claimed to be trying to help. Have college administrations failed for so many decades to fail to see the problems they are creating?

    My father didn't publish his results; he only yelled at college administration. He was a professor of engineering at one of the campuses of the University of California. One of his pet projects was to work with high schools in low income areas (mostly ethnic minority) to encourage high school students who showed aptitude in science and math into engineering as a career that (in the 1970's and 1980's) provided a solid step into the economic "middle class."

    He was therefore dismayed to analyze UC system data and learn that ethnic minority students who would have been appropriately prepared for colleges like UCRiverside or Cal State Fullerton, or CalPoly Pomona were being steered to UCLA or UC Berkeley, only to fail out a year later. And, at that time, he found that most of them completely dropped out as "failures," rather than transfer to an "easier" major. So, lots of minority students who were capable of getting an engineering degree from a "second" or "third" tier school (and going on to a solid if unexciting career in engineering) got no degree from any school, all so university administrators could brag about the number of "minority" students admitted to the top tier campuses (and ignore graduation rates).

    Along the way, he also discovered that in the UC system student enrollment, the most underrepresented demographic group relative to its population in the state, was white males. As far back as the early 1980's!

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    colleenb@colleenb·7y

    Great interview as usual. Ms. McDonald just seems so sane compared with almost all other reporters today. Sheryl Atkinson and Byron York too. Maybe because they are real reporters instead of just pundits?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Taras@Taras·7y
    ReplyingtoFull Size Tabby

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    I’m astonished that colleges are still pushing unprepared students into schools for which they are not prepared in the name of “diversity” (in my day “affirmative action”). My late father was pointing out forty years ago that such actions were harming the very students the college administration claimed to be trying to help. Have college administrations failed for so many decades to fail to see the problems they are creating?

    My father didn’t publish his results; he only yelled at college administration. He was a professor of engineering at one of the campuses of the University of California. One of his pet projects was to work with high schools in low income areas (mostly ethnic minority) to encourage high school students who showed aptitude in science and math into engineering as a career that (in the 1970’s and 1980’s) provided a solid step into the economic “middle class.”

    He was therefore dismayed to analyze UC system data and learn that ethnic minority students who would have been appropriately prepared for colleges like UCRiverside or Cal State Fullerton, or CalPoly Pomona were being steered to UCLA or UC Berkeley, only to fail out a year later. And, at that time, he found that most of them completely dropped out as “failures,” rather than transfer to an “easier” major. So, lots of minority students who were capable of getting an engineering degree from a “second” or “third” tier school (and going on to a solid if unexciting career in engineering) got no degree from any school, all so university administrators could brag about the number of “minority” students admitted to the top tier campuses (and ignore graduation rates).

    Along the way, he also discovered that in the UC system student enrollment, the most underrepresented demographic group relative to its population in the state, was white males. As far back as the early 1980’s!

    Why didn’t your father publish his results?

Scroll for later comments
+4 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of nine comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •