The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideThe American IdeaHeritage ExplainsLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeDaily SignalFederalist Radio HourThe Erick Erickson ShowNot Dead YetGiving VenturesThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesThe Glenn ShowGray MattersFirst Things PodcastThe Report Card with Nat MalkusWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnMadison’s NotesMom WarsConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Become a member.Become a Ricochet member.

Looking for better conservative conversation? Join Ricochet for just $5/month. Think of it as your neighborhood bar: familiar faces, lively debate, and room for a different point of view. Plus: listen to most of our podcasts ad-free.

  1. Podcasts/
  2. 3 Whisky Happy Hour/
  3. Fables of the Cuyahoga River Fire, with Jonathan Adler
June 21, 2019
3 Whisky Happy Hour•June 21, 2019Ricochet

Fables of the Cuyahoga River Fire, with Jonathan Adler

Subscribe to 3 Whisky Happy HourSubscribe
The Cuyahoga River on fire. But not when you think.

This Saturday, June 22, marks the 50th anniversary of one of the iconic moments of the modern environmental history—the infamous Cuyahoga River fire in Cleveland. Things were so bad, the legend goes, that rivers were catching fire! But most of what you think you know about that story is incomplete or inaccurate, argues Jonathan H. Adler, the Johan Verheij Professor of Law at Case Western Reserve University School of Law. In a now-famous article, "Fables of the Cuyahoga," Adler explains "the rest of the story," to borrow an old saying. Part of that story is about why subsequent national legislation wasn't always the best or only remedy for environmental problems.

Like most law professors, Jon is an ardent Supreme Court watcher, so we also talk about jurisprudence, the all-important "Chevron Doctrine" that is now subject of many second thoughts and potential revisions, and how a number of common perceptions of the Supreme Court are inaccurate. And since Jon specializes in environmental law, we also spend a few minutes on what else—climate change.

The bumper music was selected to match our topic: "Carbon Monoxide" by Cake, and "Bad Pollution" by the Zucchini Brothers.

Hosted by Steve Hayward

Discussion (6)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • C

    CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    colleenb@colleenb·7y

    Very interesting interview. I don't trust the climate change folk (especially since if its a crisis, act like its a crisis which means no air travel, no AC or heat, walk everywhere, etc) to see reason on this. I wish the Professor luck. Also, isn't scary that he was warned away from a history major all those years ago?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Patrick McClure@Patrickb63·7y

    "Put a cap on climate change ..."? So mankind has the ability to bring stasis to a 4.5 billion year old kinetic system? I cannot take seriously anyone who thinks that we can stabilize the climate. We can stop, as we have, putting pollutants into the air. But mankind neither causes nor can stop global warming or cooling. It is a natural process that has swung from warmer to cooler to warmer, ad infinitum. Professor Adler's belief that we can "cap" global warming reduces my respect for his intellect. Not that my opinion will make any difference in his life, just like our efforts to adjust "greenhouse gases" will actually make any difference to the climate.

  • T

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Taras@Taras·7y
    ReplyingtoPatrick McClure

    Patrick McClure (View Comment):

    “Put a cap on climate change …”? So mankind has the ability to bring stasis to a 4.5 billion year old kinetic system? I cannot take seriously anyone who thinks that we can stabilize the climate. We can stop, as we have, putting pollutants into the air. But mankind neither causes nor can stop global warming or cooling. It is a natural process that has swung from warmer to cooler to warmer, ad infinitum. Professor Adler’s belief that we can “cap” global warming reduces my respect for his intellect. Not that my opinion will make any difference in his life, just like our efforts to adjust “greenhouse gases” will actually make any difference to the climate.

    The US trying to influence global warming is rather like the passenger in a car trying to avoid an accident up ahead by leaning, when the car is being driven by China and India.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    WalterSobchakEsq@WalterSobchakEsq·7y

    Steve: You repeatedly mispronounced the name of the river in question. It is 4 syllables:

    KY ah HOE gah.

    pronouncenames.com

    Open link

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Miffed White Male@MiffedWhiteMale·7y
+1 more comment
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of six comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •