The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP Culture3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightFederalist Radio HourDaily SignalThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourGray MattersFirst Things PodcastThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Erick Erickson ShowWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnNot Dead YetHeritage ExplainsCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe Learning CurveThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesHillsdale DialoguesThe Glenn ShowMom WarsConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  1. Podcasts/
  2. The Libertarian/
  3. Can the President Fire Anyone? SCOTUS Hears Arguments in Trump v. Slaughter
December 10, 2025
The Libertarian•December 10, 2025

•Episode length: 35m

Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

Can the President Fire Anyone? SCOTUS Hears Arguments in Trump v. Slaughter

Episode length: 35m

Subscribe to The LibertarianSubscribe

Richard Epstein does a deep into the Supreme Court’s latest showdown: Trump v. Slaughter, a case that could redefine presidential removal power and the future of independent agencies like the FTC. Epstein walks through the constitutional history — from the Founding to Humphrey’s Executor to modern administrative courts — and explains how the Court’s interpretation of Article II has evolved, splintered, and in some cases contradicted itself. The conversation covers everything from the steel-seizure precedent to the Federal Reserve, the structure of the administrative state, and the unresolved tension between originalism and the practical realities of modern governance. Epstein explains why this case could be one of the most consequential constitutional questions of our time.

Hosted by Charles C. W. Cooke and Richard Epstein

Discussion (1)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Subcomandante America@TheReticulator·47w

    Sounds like I should make an exception to my practice of avoiding podcasts.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •