Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Daily Signal
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

There's a lot to gab about this week, so it's a good thing our hosts had some extra time. Among other things, the trio delve into the moral scolds who think it'd be a great idea to bowdlerize our favorite children's stories; and they're glad to hear how Vivek Ramaswamy will shake things up as the newest Republican candidate for 2024.
Then Eli Lake, who spoke with the hosts the day after the invasion, returns to assess Ukraine, Russia and the United States after one year. They get into Putin's troubles, Europe's surprising resilience, China's alleged jump into the fray, and... nukes, of course.
Hosted by James Lileks,
Peter Robinson, and
Rob Long, with guest
Eli Lake
Discussion (33)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
This bowdlerization is frankly a translation into a new language, in that translations never bring across the whole cargo -- it's simply not possible. The example of pulling hair vs wigs misses some characterization and texture, as well as substituting a supposedly equivalent expression in "nicer" terms.
No translation can convey the meaning of the original, and instead brings new baggage from the new language. It's an old problem, and not really disputed except by people with an axe to grind about the similarity of all cultures and so forth -- those folks.
So this is really a translation project, from a faraway free land into the shorn and weighted language of an oppressed people. Be nice. Or else.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Wasn't "fat" changed to "enormous" and isn't "enormous" worse?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I think the word @RobLong was looking for, in regard to China, was "inscrutable."
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Inscrutaburu.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The “updaters” of Roald Dahl’s books are grave robbers, pure and simple: editorial vampires of the worst sort.
You're seeing five of 33 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.